1. The Defendant-Counterclaim Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) indicated the attached Table 14, 15, and 16.

1. In full view of the reasoning of the judgment as to the cause of the principal claim, Gap evidence Nos. 1-13, 15, 19, 20 each, witness D, E’s testimony, on-site verification and appraisal by the Korea Cadastral Survey Corporation, the Plaintiff and the defendant, on May 10, 2014, connected the following points: on May 10, 2014, 36-40, 52, 51, 50, 49, 49, 48, 47, 46, 45, 44, 36, and 357 square meters of G and 357 square meters of land (the defendant, who was the owner of the above FF land and the owner of the above G, has occupied the boundary of the land under mutual understanding; on-line 1, 36-40, 371, 47, 47, 45, 36, and 36, the part of each of the appraisal contract.

(B) The Plaintiff is obligated to implement the registration procedure for transfer of ownership on May 10, 2014 with respect to the portion of “B” connected in sequence with each point of the attached Table 14, 15, 16, 17, and 14, among the land C, on the part of “B” 179 square meters, in order to the Plaintiff according to the facts acknowledged as above.

2. The summary of the argument regarding the defense and the counterclaim against the main claim: The defendant shall not only make a defense against the main claim as follows, but also seek a stable removal and a delivery of 163 square meters for the portion above (B) 163 square meters, by asserting that the plaintiff, without title, has installed a stable on the same part as that stated in the counterclaim claim among the land C, and without title, has occupied 163 square meters.

① The Defendant is transferred from the Plaintiff the land and the right of possession as described in Article 1-1(1) of the above Act. The Defendant erred in the Plaintiff’s transfer of the part adjacent to the H road among the land C to the extent that the Plaintiff’s vehicle can pass by.