The case holding that, in a case where: (a) the Korean Institute of Education and Planning issued the written answer of the issue No. 8 of the World Geographical Ability Test in 2014 after the completion of the College Ability Test in 2014 in 2012; (b) the examinee Gap, etc., who applied for global geographicalism, filed an objection with the Institute to have a fingerprint with the 'c(c) fingerprints affixed; (c) the Institute determined that there is no error in giving answers; and (d) notified applicants, including Gap, etc. of the results of the examination, the examination of the above issue

In a case where the Korean Institute of Education and Planning, after the completion of the College College College Ability Test in 2014, announces 1 and 2 times the response of the issue in the world 8 years following the completion of the 2014 Curriculum Test, Gap et al., among the examinees applying for the World Geographical Studies, applied for an objection to the response of the question 8th 'c/ her fingerprints' without complying with objective facts, but the Korean Institute of Education and Technology has held a relevant academic council after consultation with the relevant academic council, decided that there is no error in the response of the above issue, etc., and notified the results of the examination, the case holding that the 'c/ her fingerprints' can not be seen as the 'c/ her fingerprints', and in any case it is difficult to regard the 'c/ her fingerprints' as the 'c/ her fingerprints' as the 'c/ her fingerprints', and that the average 'c/ her fingerprints' of the above questions can not be seen as the 'c/ her fingerprints'.

Article 34 of the Higher Education Act; Article 35 of the Enforcement Decree of the Higher Education Act; Article 45(3)2 of the Regulations on Delegation and Entrustment of Administrative Authority; Article 27 of the Administrative Litigation Act

Attached 1 List of Plaintiffs (Attorney Ma Tae-tae et al., Counsel for the plaintiff-appellant)

Korean Institute of Education and Planning and one other (Law Firm Square et al., Counsel for the plaintiff-appellant)

December 13, 2013

1. All of the plaintiffs' lawsuits against the defendant Minister of Education are dismissed.

2. The plaintiffs' claims against the defendant Institute of Korean Curriculum Evaluation and Planning are all dismissed.

3. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

On November 27, 2013, the Defendants issued the College College College College Test for the Plaintiffs on November 27, 2014 and revoked the determination of grade on global geographical subjects.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. Pursuant to Article 34 of the Higher Education Act, Article 35 of the Enforcement Decree of the same Act, and Article 45(3)2 of the Regulations on Delegation and Entrustment of Administrative Authority, Defendant Korea Institute of Education (hereinafter “Korea Institute”) has performed the work of setting questions, printing, marking, giving notice of grade, formulation and implementation of a detailed implementation plan, etc., as entrusted by the Defendant and entrusted by the Minister of Education.

B. In November 7, 2013, 2014, an examinee passed the 600,000 qualifying examination. Of them, 37,684 examinees, including the Plaintiffs, selected a global efficience among the subjects of choice in the area of social search and inspection.

C. Following the completion of the examination, the Institute of Korea Institute of Education and Planning issued a correct response to the water-related test in 2014 by using the written response of the issue No. 8 of the World Geographical (hereinafter referred to as the “instant issue”) as “A” and “C (hereinafter referred to as the “instant fingerprint”), including the fingerprints of the instant issue, and the Plaintiffs did not mention the specific response of the instant issue in 2014. The content of the instant issue is as indicated in [Attachment 2” (hereinafter referred to as the “instant issue”), as indicated in [Attachment 2, the “(2012”) indicated on the right side of the map].

D. On November 13, 2013, some of the examinees who applied for the diversology of the diversity test filed an objection to the response of the instant issue on the ground that the fingerprint was not consistent with objective facts with the KET, and thus, the Defendant Institute of Education and Planning applied for a correct response to the instant issue on the ground that the fingerprint was a divers. On November 13, 2013, the Korea Institute of Education and Planning held a working committee for the examination of the objection and decided

E. On November 14, 2013, the Korean Institute of Economic and Geographical Education requested consultation on the question of this case, the meaning of indication of this year, and the authenticity of the fingerprints of this case. On November 15, 2013, the Korean Association of Economic and Geographical Studies and the Korean Association of Environmental Education present their opinions that there is no error in the fixed response of the problem of this case to the Korean Institute of Education. The major contents of the opinions of the Korean Association of Economic and Geographical Studies and the Korean Association of Environmental Education are as stated in the attached Table 3.

F. On November 18, 2013, the Korea Institute of Education and Planning decided that there is no error in the response to the instant issue, etc. by holding a review committee.

G. On November 27, 2013, the Korea Institute of Education and Planning of the instant case (hereinafter “instant disposition”), premised on the premise that the fixed response to the instant issue was ②, Defendant Korea Institute of Education and Evaluation, including the Plaintiffs, determined the grade of applicants for the water performance test in 2014, and notified the Plaintiffs of the results of the water performance test in 2014 (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1-1 to 31, Gap evidence 2-1 to 30, Gap evidence 5-1, 2, Eul evidence 4, Eul evidence 13, Eul evidence 16, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the litigation against the defendant is legitimate;

In principle, an administrative litigation seeking the revocation of an administrative disposition must be the defendant with the administrative agency that conducted an administrative disposition under his/her external name, which is the subject of the lawsuit. On the other hand, the defendant education did not conduct the instant disposition against the plaintiffs. Therefore, the defendant of the lawsuit of this case seeking the revocation of the disposition of this case

Therefore, the plaintiffs' lawsuit against the defendant Minister of Education is unlawful.

3. Determination on the claim against the defendant Institute of Korean Curricula

A. The plaintiffs' assertion

(i) procedural defects;

Since the objection to the fixed answer of the instant issue is a serious objection, the Korean Institute of Curriculum should have received the objection to the fixed answer of the instant issue and immediately requested the relevant academic council to provide advice. However, on November 13, 2013, the Korean Institute of Curricula held a working committee for the examination of the instant issue without consultation with the relevant academic council to determine that there is no error in the fixed response of the instant issue, and requested consultation with the Korean Association of Economic Geographical Studies and the Korean Association of Environmental Education only after making the aforementioned decision. In addition, the Korean Institute of Curriculum decided on the objection to the fixed answer of the instant issue without holding the deliberation committee on the objection to the serious issue.

Therefore, the instant disposition is unlawful on the ground that procedural defects exist.

2) An error in the instant issue

The fingerprints in this case seems to mean the total production amount of the European Union (EU, the EU) and the North America Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), as seen in paragraph (d) of the same Article, without presenting the comparison point, even though it is compared with the total production amount of the European Union (Nros Dos Does Do Do Do Do Do Do dP). Thus, the total production amount is not a domestic total production, a national total production (Gros NNP, GNP), or a national total income (Gros Nals Nalcom, GNI), and if the fingerprints in this case was based on the general tendency or trend of the total production amount of the European Union and North America Free Trade Agreements, there is no significant error in terms of the following: (a) the fingerprint in this case does not have any expression such as “alternative or tendency” in itself; (b) the total production amount is not a national total production or a national total production (Gros NNP); and (c) the fingerprint in this case does not have any expression such as this case.

In addition, the fingerprint of this case did not present the necessary comparison point in comparison with the total production amount. Considering that the map included in the issue of this case is indicated in the year of 2012, the map Nos. 4, 5, and 14 of the 2014, and the issue Nos. 11, 13, 14, 18, 19, and 20 of the Republic of Korea (attached Form 4, the same shall apply to the description of the global geographic and Korean geographic issues) should solve the problem on the basis of the year indicated in the picture, the time when comparing the total production amount of the Free Trade Agreement with the European Union should be 2012 years in accordance with the marking of the year of this case, since the total production amount of the North America Free Trade Agreements is larger than the total production amount of the European Union, the fingerprint of this case is objectively clear.

The World Geographical Subjects include the total production amount of the European Union and the North America FTA as of 2007, and do not reflect objective facts that the total production amount of the North America FTA was higher than the European Union since 2010. Even though textbooks are written differently from objective facts, it does not fit the purpose of education of high school curriculum and normal global geographicism. For the purpose of waterway tests, examinees must study current topics in addition to textbooks. In fact, when the Free Trade Agreement is concluded in Korea, China and Japan, it is necessary to study current topics in addition to textbooks, and if the economic scale of the North America FTA was higher than the European Union due to the financial crisis of the European Union, it is natural that they can easily understand the implications that the number of examinees could easily have been compared with the objective facts through newspapers and broadcasting.

Considering the above circumstances, this case’s fingerprint cannot be a correct fingerprint, and accordingly, it cannot be a correct answer to the issue of this case’s fingerprint (2). Therefore, even though the issue of this case ought to be deemed to have no correct response, the disposition of this case by the Korea Institute of Education and Planning, which decided the global rating of the plaintiffs, is unlawful.

B. Facts of recognition

The following facts can be acknowledged in full view of each evidence, evidence No. 4, evidence No. 6-1, evidence No. 6-2, evidence No. 8, evidence No. 1, evidence No. 2, evidence No. 2, evidence No. 6, evidence No. 7-1, and evidence No. 7-3, and the whole purport of argument No. 7.

1) High school curriculum

The “elementary and Secondary School curriculum” (amended by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology No. 2009-41, Dec. 23, 2009) contains the following contents as to the global curriculum of high school.

The objective of Table 2. The objective of Table 2. The world set forth in the main text is to comprehensively and systematically understand the geographical phenomenon of each region of the world, to seek a path for cooperation and mutual respect between regions in the era of globalization, and to develop, use, and preserve the base of our life from the global perspective as a better space for living in the world. (a) to develop a systematic and comprehensive understanding of various natural environment and human environment in the world. (c) to seek a path for inter-regional cooperation and mutual respect, and to understand and resolve conflicts and disputes between regions. (6) to understand changes in the world economic environment, such as economic block and free trade agreements, and to understand conflicts and mutual respect among the countries, regions, and residents surrounding it.The evaluation is conducted on May 1, 200: The evaluation is conducted in a comprehensive way beyond the basic direction for presentation of basic principles, the concept of understanding and understanding of the concept and attitude of regional knowledge and value, and the comprehensive understanding of the concept and degree of understanding of new knowledge and value in the region.

2) Master plans, etc. to conduct the 2014 Do 2014

A) On March 29, 2013, the Korea Institute of Education and Planning published a master plan to implement the hydro-performance test (hereinafter “master plan for hydro-performance test”) on March 29, 2013, and the main contents thereof are as follows.

1. The purpose of the examination is to measure the academic ability of 0000 universities and colleges and to provide 20% of the standard teaching materials for the purpose of 1000, 2000, 300,000,000,0000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000: 7,000,0000,000,000,000,000, 7,0000,000,000,000,000,00,00,00.

B) On July 1, 2013, the Korean Institute of Education and Planning published the detailed plan for the implementation of the water-performance test (hereinafter “water-performance test detailed plan”) on July 1, 2013, and the main contents thereof are as follows.

The schedule* problem and the response processing procedure in the main sentence - the 2014-year 2014 processing period for filing an objection: The filing period: November 7, 2013 to November 11, 2013 - the processing period: the filing period: the filing period: the filing period between November 12, 2013 and November 18, 2013: the date of the final reply: the date of the holding of the Working Committee for Examination on November 18, 2013: the date of the holding of the Working Committee for Examination: the period of November 17:0 (1) of November 13, 2013 to November 15, 2013; the processing period for filing an objection; the filing period for filing an objection; the processing period for filing an objection: Important matters that are classified by the Working Committee for Examination and Examination; the preparation of materials and answers to which an objection has been filed; and the filing period for delivering important matters to the ○ Working Committee for Examination and Examination;

(iii) the results of the 2014 World Geographical Rating

A) The rating classification points, the number of persons by grade and the percentage by grade according to the rating results for examinees who applied for the World Geographical Examination in 2014 are as follows:

The rate of 165 1,7384.61 2622,9727 89 359 4,438 1.78 45 6,314 6,316.76 56.77,922 1.02 6416,046 16.04 76 36.36,316 832,45 832,608 9.29 2,608 1,303.5 1,303.53

B) The fixed response rate of the instant issue was 49.89%. The fixed response rate by grade for the instant issue was 100%, 2nd class 91%, 3rd class 80%, 4th class 64%, 5th class 47%, 6th class 29%, 7th class 18%, 8th class 12%, and 9th class 7%.

4) Contents of the High School Global Textbooks

Textbook (225 pages) stating that “When Korea, Japan, and China enters into a free trade agreement, it is anticipated that Korea, and China will be injured to the world-wide integrated market following the World Trade Agreement, North America, and the three major economic sphere will be reached.” The maps indicated together with the above contents state USD 18,387 billion, and the total production amount of the European Union was expressed as USD 16,467 billion, based on the international statistical reduction in statistics in 2009, and USD 16,467 billion.” The World Geographic Textbook (125 pages) stating that “The Rotterdam is an official book of the European Union, which is the largest market in the world-wide world-wide.” The contents of each textbook are as follows:

A) Global Textbooks for publication of school affairs (No. 225 pages)

A person shall be appointed.

B) Global Textbook 125 pages of the World Institute Textbook for astronomical Reeducation

A person shall be appointed.

(v) the total production amount of the European Union and North America FTA;

According to the data published by the World Bank for International Bank for the Republic of Korea, the average of the total production of the European Union and the North America FTA from 2007 to 2011 was the European Union, and the average of the total production of the European Union and the North America FTA from 2007 to 2012 was the higher than the North America FTA. According to the data published by the United Nations, the average of the total production of the European Union and the North America FTA from 2007 to 2011 was the higher than the average production of the North America FTA from 2008 and 2009.

6) World Geographical and Korean Geographical Affairs, other than the instant issues,

The problems of 2014 are as shown in Appendix 4, 5, 14 and 11, 13, 14, 18, 19, and 20 are listed in the World Geographical Examination Year 4, 5, 14 and 11, 13, 14, 19, and 20.

C. Determination

1) Determination of procedural defects

The Native Test Master Plan states that “The relevant academic council (or external experts) shall be requested to provide advice on serious matters (including questions, answers errors, and questions likely to violate the curriculum) from the time of receiving the objection, and in the case of serious matters, at least three external experts who are not members preparing the objection shall be present at each area, and, if necessary, the relevant academic council (or external experts) shall be requested to provide advice.” According to the Native Test Plan, upon receipt of an objection, the Native Examination Working Committee shall classify the matters raised by the Native Committee as simple and important matters, and classify the matters raised by the objection as an important matter, and determine the response details of the objection, and then refer the important matters to the Committee, and thereafter, the Committee shall be held to deliberate and confirm the matters determined by the E-Examination Working Committee, and the matters referred to as an important matter shall be dealt with.

On the other hand, the following circumstances, which are acknowledged by comprehensively taking into account the aforementioned facts and the purport of the entire arguments, i.e., the Korea Institute of Education, the Evaluation, the Institute of Education, the Korea Institute of Education, and the Korea Institute of Education, decided to the effect that there is no error in the response to the instant issue, etc., and ii) the final decision on the objection to the objection to the question is an objection that is not the working committee for the examination. As such, the final decision on the objection to the objection to the question is an objection that is not the working committee for the examination, so long as the Korea Institute of Economic and Regional Studies and the Korea Institute of Environmental Education requested consultation on the reply to the question of this case before the meeting of the Committee for the Examination, it is difficult to deem that there is a defect in the consultation of the relevant academic committee on the reply to the question of this case after the meeting of the Committee for the Examination, and the Korea Institute of Economic and Regional Studies and the Korea Institute of Environmental Education, in light of the fact that it is not necessarily required to receive related advice from the working committee for the examination.

Therefore, the plaintiffs' above assertion is without merit.

2) Determination as to the error of the instant issue

In general, the preparing commissioner who prepares an examination as an administrative act shall have discretion in the sense that he/she can freely determine what kind of matter is within the scope of the statutory provisions and what terms and forms of questions and answers to be made within the scope of the statutory provisions. However, since the discretion has an inherent limit to be exercised properly in the contents and composition of the preparation so that he/she can assess the ability of the examinees in accordance with the purpose of the examination, the act of preparing questions shall be illegal if the exercise of its discretion exceeds the limit.

On the other hand, in the preparation of a multiple-choice issue, the selection of the text composition or expression terms in the text form or answer form has been wrong, and as a result, an average level of examinees are made unable to choose a legitimate answer port, it may be deviation from or abuse of discretionary power. However, if the examinee at an average level is at the degree that he/she does not interfere with the grasping of the genuine intent of the multiple-choice questions and the selection of the answer form through the comprehensive analysis and analysis of the method of preparation of the multiple-choice answer form or the entire text and answer form, he/she shall not be deemed deviation or abuse of discretionary power unless there are special circumstances

In addition, due to the nature of the objective test questions, the degree of preparation and the instructions for the selection of the answer questions shall be objectively grasped and assessed in the test questions themselves, and without any special circumstances, it cannot be determined by writing the intent of the preparing questions at will beyond the limit of the text, but it is not explicitly determined by the text, but rather by the comprehensive analysis of the text and answer questions, and the instructions for the selection of the answer questions clearly and implicitly through the comprehensive analysis of the text and answer questions are determined. As such, the examinee is required to compare and examine the contents of the text and answer questions in accordance with the aforementioned explicit and implied instructions and put only one appropriate for the most appropriate answer (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2010Du17267, 17274, Jul. 14, 201).

In addition, all the circumstances related to the examination questions from the perspective of the overall legal order, such as the character of the setting subject, motive for setting questions, the contents, expressions and composition of the disputed questions and answers, and the degree of understanding ability of the examinees, shall be examined in a concrete and comprehensive manner (see Supreme Court Decision 9Da33960, Apr. 10, 2001, etc.).

In this case, in light of the following circumstances, the aforementioned facts and evidence Nos. 8-1 through 4, Eul’s evidence Nos. 9-1 through 3, and the overall purport of the arguments and arguments, it cannot be deemed that even if the fingerprints of this case is either vague or unclear, it cannot be deemed that the average level of examinees did not choose the response of the problem of this case. Thus, the setting of the issue of this case cannot be deemed unlawful as it deviates from or abused discretion. Accordingly, the plaintiffs’ above assertion is without merit.

A) Of the issue of this case, “1” fingerprints appears to be “(1) that the foreign capital investment in Mexico has increased rapidly as it appeared in the North America Free Trade Agreement.” Inasmuch as the foreign capital investment in Mexico has been concluded, it is obviously correct to fingerprints. Inasmuch as fingerprints is considered to be subject to joint customs duties outside the territory of the European Union and the North America Free Trade Agreement, and the North America FTA does not impose any customs duties outside the territory, so it is clearly solid fingerprints.” The “4” fingerprint is considered to be of high importance than the total amount of trade outside the European Union, and the European Union is of high importance, so it cannot be seen that the percentage of this case’s fingerprints was clearly amper than that of the North America Free Trade Agreement. Therefore, considering the circumstances seen in the following (b) through (d) the 4th answer to this case’s fingerprint, it cannot be seen that the 9th answer to this case’s fingerprint, which is obviously legitimate and unreasonable, including the “1st answer to this case’s fingerprint,” and thus, it cannot be seen that the 4th answer to this case’s answer to this case’s answer.

B) Since the fingerprints of this case is “the European Union has a large total production amount than the North America FTA,” there is unclear point as to which time the total production amount should be compared. However, in light of the global Geographical Subjects adopted in the process of high school subjects, “it is anticipated that if Korea, Japan and China enter into a free trade agreement, it will be injured to the world-wide integrated market following the Free Trade Agreement, North America, and the world-wide 3 economic sphere (school affairs world book)” or “Irrhian as the official book of the European Union, which is the largest market in the world-wide,” and it is difficult to conclude that the total production amount of fingerprint of this case can not be seen as the average production amount of fingerprint from 20 years to 10 years from the date of the production of the textbook of this case, even if it is no more than the average production amount of fingerprint from 20 years from the date of the production of the textbook of this case.”

C) ① As the map indicated on the issue of the instant case has indicated the pertinent year, the fingerprint of the instant case may be interpreted as fingerprinting whether the total amount of production in any region of the European Union and the North America Free Trade Agreement exceeds the total amount of production as of the year 2012. We examine whether such interpretation ought to be made.

② Of the instant issues, “A”, “B”, and “Div” fingerprints are not fingerprintss that can determine right and wrong based on the 2012-year indication in the instant year. “A” fingerprints is at the time of the conclusion of the North America Free Trade Agreement (2012), and is always molded regardless of the 2012-year period.

③ We examine the cases of other issues in global geographical examination. The issue No. 4 is not an issue of identifying the nation as of 2010 years indicated in the map, but an issue of identifying the population density of 2010, total domestic production per capita, and whether the South-U.S. joint market member was a member of the map. As such, it is not an issue of asking whether all the above data are aware of the statistics in 2010. The issue of No. 5 is indicated in the map as of 2011, and it is not an issue of identifying the importance of each country’s energy production and the primary energy consumption structure as of 201, and then asking whether the country becomes aware of the characteristics of the energy resources in the fingerprints, and it is difficult to find out the issue of whether there is a large volume of national food resources being aware of the characteristics of the resources in the region as of 10 years, such as the quantity of domestic food resources being identified in the map, and whether there is a large volume of resources being known in the region as of 10 years.

④ The issue of No. 11 in South and North Korea is that, after presenting the remaining area of 2008 and the area of 10 years of 2008 and the production rate of food crops, in South Korea, it is possible to grasp crops that are rarely cultivated in South Korea and determine their fingerprints based on such data, so it does not appear to be a problem of asking about what the above statistics in 2008 are known. The issue of finding the above problem is that the number of 13 years of 10 years of 20 years of 20 years of 20 years of 20 years of 20 years of 20 years of 10 years of 20 years of 20 years of 20 years of 3 years of 10 years of 20 years of 20 years of 20 years of 20 years of 20 years of 20 years of 20 years of 20 years of 20 years of 20 years of 20 years of 20 years of 20 years of 3.

(5) According to “elementary and secondary school curriculum”, the purpose of which is to comprehensively and systematically understand the humanities and nature of each region of the world, is to understand changes in the world economic environment in relation to economic block and free trade agreements, and to understand conflicts and respect among the countries, regions, and residents surrounding such changes. It is suggested in the direction of comprehensively assessing the understanding of general concepts and principles, problem resolution ability, internalization and attitude of value, and degree of formation of belief rather than simple facts or simple knowledge. According to the waterway test basic plan, the purpose of providing hydro-high school curriculum is to measure the ability of education necessary for university education and to prepare a screening data in line with the level and content of high school curriculum, to contribute to the normalization of high school education and to provide them with high school fairness and objectivity, and to understand the concept and ability of study in the world as well as to understand the concept and ability of study of high school in accordance with the basic principles that can be compared with the basic principles of high school curriculum in order to contribute to the normalization of school education, and to understand the concept and ability of study in the world as well as to understand the scope of study.

(6) Of the instant issues, three fingerprintss, other than the fingerprint of this case, are fingerprintss that can be judged as correct regardless of the year 2012, regardless of whether they can be compared with the year indicated in the guidance, and it is difficult to view it as a matter of examining whether specific statistical values and comparisons can be made by comparing with those of other issues of the global geographic and Korean Geographicalties with the year indicated in the guidance. Considering the purpose of education at high school global geographicism, it is an exceptional point of view that setting up the problem of comparing the latest economic statistics that are not attributable to textbooks in the global geographical subject of the able testing is not written in the instant fingerprint of 2012, but rather, indicating the “(2012)” at the right side of the instant issue as of the date indicated in the direction of the instant case, it cannot be said that the instant fingerprints of the European Union and North America Free Trade Agreements should be interpreted as fingerprinting as 2012.

D) It is difficult to view that there is no evidence suggesting that only the “total production amount” is a domestic total production or a national total production, and that the above “total production amount” is not clearly defined (in light of the language of the “total production amount, it is difficult to view that there is a possibility that examinees might mislead the total production amount as a national total income). However, in light of the purpose of education at high school world, it is difficult to view that: (i) the accurate understanding and definition of economic terms in the subjects; and (ii) the difference in statistics in a specific region in relation to such terms is difficult to view that education is conducted in a specific region; (iii) there is no evidence suggesting that the “total production amount” of the fingerprints in the instant case is a domestic total production or a national total production; and (iii) the Plaintiffs are asserting that the “total production amount” in the instant lawsuit is a domestic total production or submission of materials related to the domestic production; and (iv) it is difficult to regard that the fingerprints in this case’s fingerprint is a national total production or a national total production machine.

E) Meanwhile, even if examinees applying for the 2014 2014 Do 2014 interpreted this case’s fingerprint as fingerprinting to which area’s total production amount is greater as of the 2012-year 2012-year 2012, since the 2012 Do 2000 stated that the European Union’s global subject of high school curriculum is more than that of the Free Trade Agreement, it is difficult to determine that the average 2012-year 2012-year 2000’s subject of the 20-year 4 Do 2014 Do 2014 Do 2014 Do 2014 Do 2014 Do 2014 Do 2014 Do 201222, 202 Do 2022, 202 Do 2014 Do 222, 2014 Do 32, 2012.

F) In addition, if the total production of the North America Free Trade Agreement in 2012 is more than the European Union and it is deemed that there is no correct response to the problem of this case, an average level of examinee who studies the waterway test is the same as an objective statistical value, and whether the objective statistical value has been changed after the base year from the textbook (in case of loans, the standard year from the textbook is no longer than the actual time of study), etc. of the textbook is the burden of conducting the study by checking daily. However, it is not only likely to impede the normalization of high school education, but also is also inconsistent with the purpose of measuring the ability of education necessary for university education and providing a fair and objectivity screening data.

4. Conclusion

Therefore, the plaintiffs' lawsuits against the defendant Minister of Education are dismissed in its entirety as it is unlawful, and the claims against the defendant Institute of Korean Curriculum Evaluation and Planning are dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

[Attachment 1] List of Plaintiffs: omitted

[Attachment 2] The issue of this case: omitted

[Attachment 3] Opinion of the Academy: omitted

[Attachment 4] Global Geographical and Korean Geographical Affairs: omitted

Judges anti-Japanese Co., Ltd. (Presiding Justice)

Note 1) The term “A” indicated in the instant case’s guidance refers to the European Union, and “B” refers to the North America FTA, and when indicating the content of each fingerprint of the instant issue, “A” is the European Union, and “B” is indicated in the North America FTA.