logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.08.27 2014고단1820
개인정보보호법위반
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for eight months and by imprisonment with prison labor for one year.

However, for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B From around September 2008 to August 201, 2008, “AI’s life” worked as an insurance manager. From around September 2008 to around August 2010, B established an insurance corporation with the trade name “D” in Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government and took overall charge of insurance business, such as insurance sales and tele-marketing business.

Defendant

A is an insurance solicitor from March 2006 to August 2007 to the “LIG non-life insurance; from January 2008 to May 2009 to the head of the E-Mapo branch; from May 2009 to December 2010 to the head of the F Insurance Corporation; from January 2009 to December 201, to the head of the Marpo branch; and from January 201 to August 2012, to the head of the new village branch of the G Insurance Corporation; and was engaged in insurance business for several years.

Defendant

B The relationship between “D” and “H” that requires large amounts of personal information in order to start a telemarket insurance business around September 2009, and upon entering into a marketing agency contract with “H” and “H”, the “D” had been provided with a total of ten times from September 2009 to June 2010, and used it for “D”’s telemarket insurance business.

Defendant

B Around August 2010, when the suspension of business of “D” came to death, B received and kept the said personal information database from “D”. Around January 2012, the Defendant, working for the head of a new village branch of “G” insurance company, agreed to provide KRW 30,000,000,000, upon receipt of a proposal to change the personal information database for insurance business.

However, at the time, Defendant B had no legitimate authority to provide the above personal information database to Defendant A, as well as the situation where the consent of the subject of the personal information was not obtained in providing the personal information.

Nevertheless, Defendant B stored the said 120,000 personal information from February 2, 2012 to March 2012.

arrow