Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

If the Defendants did not pay each of the above fines, 50.

Punishment of the crime

Victim C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “victim”) is an enterprise established for the purpose of IT consulting, production of its website, advertisement agency, etc., and E is a person who works for the marketing department of the victim company from September 2012 to April 24, 2013 and has been in charge of tele-marketing business that solicits the victim company to produce its website and run Internet advertising agency by telephone. Defendant A is from June 2012 to December 2012; Defendant B works for the marketing department of each victim company from September 2012 to December 2012, Defendant B is a person who establishes and operates F, the same kind of business as the victim company.

After the end of March 2013, the Defendants informed the victim company of relevant information, such as the name, contact address, Internet BLG address, and business status of the company in which E is operating as an advertising agency in the victim company, the Defendants conspired to collect advertising agency contracts by using the above information in favor of the victim company's terms and conditions, and to have 30% of the advertising amount if the contract was sexually terminated.

1. On April 1, 2013, from around April 23, 2013 to April 23, 2013, the victim company’s office located in the second 507 of the building G in Geumcheon-gu Seoul, Geumcheon-gu, Seoul. The employees of the victim company informed the Defendants of the information, such as the name and telephone number of 83 companies, including “H,” where they were engaged in tele-marketing business for the purpose of concluding contracts on behalf of the victim company through the victim company’s name and telephone number. The Defendants using the above information, thereby hindering the business activities of the victim company and obstructing the conclusion of contracts.

As a result, the Defendants conspired with E and interfered with the tele-market business of the victim company by fraud.

2...