logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.06.27 2014고단1615
정보통신망이용촉진및정보보호등에관한법률위반
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months, and imprisonment with prison labor for one and half years.

, however, from the date this judgment becomes final.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. From August 2013 to October 2013, Defendant A, in collusion with F, knew of the fact that the server of the site related to the loan illegally intruded the user’s name, resident registration number, mobile phone number, address, etc., the personal information was divulged, Defendant A received, from August 2013 to October 2013, 149 files “20xlxxx,” in which personal information, such as name, resident registration number, cell phone number, address, etc., was stored, by means of delivery of e-mail, etc., of personal information 1,493,087 items (786,292 items (M), 786, 292 items) via 149 times, as indicated in the crime list 1, as the crime list.

As a result, the Defendant, in collusion with F, received individual personal information for profit with knowledge of the divulgence of personal information.

2. Defendant B

A. The Defendant violated the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, Etc. (hereinafter “O”) operates a loan brokerage company from April 2012 to the name of “O” in the Nam-gu, Incheon.

On July 18, 2013, the Defendant received the “csex e.txt” file from A(P) around July 18, 2013, which contains personal information, such as name, cell phone number, etc., and cell phone numbers, from the Defendant’s use, with the aim of using it in soliciting customers with knowledge of the divulgence of personal information, such as the name of the user, cell phone number, etc., due to illegal intrusion of the server of the site related to the loan.

In addition, the Defendant received from April 2012 to July 18, 2013 personal information 926,277 items (346,723 items after overlapping removal) as shown in the attached Table 2, as between R, S, and A, as the same circumstance.

As a result, the Defendant knowingly received personal information for profit.

B. Violation of the Attorney-at-Law Act.

arrow