1. All of the plaintiffs' lawsuits against the defendants are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. Basic facts

A. A. In around 2002, the Jeju Real Estate Trust Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “K non-real Estate Trust Co., Ltd.”) and the Jeju Industries Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “the Jeju Industries”) entered into a trust agreement with 1,858 households (hereinafter “lease apartment Co., Ltd, which correspond to publicly constructed rental houses under Article 2 subparag. 1 of the former Enforcement Decree of the Rental Housing Act (amended by Presidential Decree No. 18315, Mar. 17, 2004; hereinafter the same) (hereinafter “instant rental apartment”), which were newly constructed on A and B ground at the time of leisure by the Jeju Industries.

B. On April 9, 2002, the K non-real estate trust obtained approval for the invitation of occupants on April 9, 2002, and announced the invitation of occupants to homeless households residing in the leisure time, but when the application of occupants falls short, it recruited occupants on a first-come first-served basis

From April 2002, K non-real estate trust concluded a lease agreement with the plaintiffs who applied for occupancy on a first-come, first-served basis with regard to each of the relevant real estate listed in the “real estate” column in attached Table 1 among the lease apartments of this case (hereinafter “each of the instant real estate”) by setting the lease term from November 15, 2002 to five years.

C. On August 29, 2007, Seogrgrgrhe purchased the rental apartment of this case from the K non-real estate trust, succeeded to the status of the rental business operator of the K non-real estate trust, and completed the registration of ownership transfer on November 30 of the same year.

On December 2, 2007, the Western-do government concluded a lease contract with the plaintiffs who have expired the lease term of the above lease from around December 2007, to extend the lease term.

On October 2010, Seogrri-do applied for approval for conversion to sale in lots for 1,392 households among the rental apartments in the instant case to the female Mayor. On October 12, 2012, the female water market is to 1,15 households which are included by the plaintiffs among the above 1,392 households.