Text
1. The plaintiff's lawsuit against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. A. Around 2002, the Jeju Real Estate Trust Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “K non-Real Estate Trust Co., Ltd.”) and the Jeju Industries Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “the Jeju Industries”) entered into a trust agreement with the E-Lease Apartment Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “instant rental apartment”) falling under publicly constructed publicly constructed rental houses under Article 2 subparag. 1 of the former Enforcement Decree of the Rental Housing Act (amended by Presidential Decree No. 18315, Mar. 17, 2004; hereinafter the same) (hereinafter “instant rental apartment”), which was newly constructed on the land C and D when the Jeju Industries was in leisure time.
B. On April 9, 2002, the K non-real estate trust obtained approval for the invitation of occupants on April 9, 2002, and announced the invitation of occupants to homeless households residing in the leisure time, but when the application of occupants falls short, it recruited occupants on a first-come first-served basis
On April 2002, K non-real estate trust entered into a lease agreement with the Plaintiff, who applied for occupancy in the first-come first-served order, setting the lease term from November 15, 2002 to five years.
C. On August 29, 2007, Seogrgrgrhe purchased the rental apartment of this case from the K non-real estate trust, succeeded to the status of the rental business operator of the K non-real estate trust, and completed the registration of ownership transfer on November 30 of the same year.
On December 2, 2007, the Western-do government entered into a lease contract with the Plaintiff whose lease term expires and whose lease term expires. D.
At around October 2010, Seo-do filed an application for approval for conversion to sale in lots for 1,392 households among the rental apartments in this case with the Mayor of Seoman-si, and on October 12, 2012, the Seo-si market approved conversion to sale in lots for 1,155 households including the plaintiff among the households above 1,392 households of the same year.
(hereinafter “this case’s approval for conversion for sale in lots”). Clerks around October 22, 2010 shall be the case.