(영문) 광주지방법원 2015.11.18 2015고단878

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 광주지방법원 2015.11.18 2015고단878

사기등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The defrauded was unable to pay monthly rent, and the Defendant was unable to pay KRW 3,000,000,000,000,000, which is one’s own residence, and there was no property from the victim C to the degree of deduction.

Nevertheless, on February 7, 2014, the Defendant, at a Buddhist coffee shop located in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Gwangju, concluded that the Defendant would provide the borrower with KRW 3,000,000 as security, with the money borrowed from the lender, and received KRW 1,00,000 from the victim to the bank account in the name of the Defendant.

including this, the Defendant from February 7, 2014 to the same year.

5. From 15. up to 15. up to 15.00, a sum of KRW 13,510,000 was received by deceiving the victim as stated in the separate crime list.

2. On February 18, 2014, the Defendant drafted a copy of a real estate lease agreement in the name of Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Gwangju, Seo-gu, with a pen for the purpose of exercising the right, on the paper of the real estate lease agreement, the Defendant entered the real estate indication in the paper of the real estate lease agreement into the paper of the pen for the purpose of exercising the right. The deposit money for lease is KRW 401,00,000,000, a deposit is KRW 10,000,000, in the name of Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seoul, and the lessor’s personal information is written as “Seoul, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seoul, and KRW 1,00,00,000, in the form of a real estate lease agreement in the name of Seo-gu, with a seal affixed to the lessor’s name.

Since then, the Defendant borrowed money as stated in paragraph (1) of the facts charged, and said C knew of the forgery for the purpose of collateral, as if the two copies of the above real estate lease contract were duly formed.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the defendant forges two copies of the real estate lease contract in G name, which is a private document on rights and obligations.

유사 판례

-광주지방법원 해남지원 2015.08.10 2015고단251

-서울동부지방법원 2015.04.01 2014고단3127

-수원지방법원 성남지원 2014.06.27 2013고단3009

-대구지방법원 서부지원 2014.01.16 2013고단1439

-서울중앙지방법원 2014.06.26 2014고단2808