logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2015.04.01 2014고단3127
사기등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment for one year, and each of the defendants B shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2014 Highest 3127, Defendant A], along with B, G, and H, stated that the Defendant forged the real estate lease agreement under the name of I, and committed as if it were the actual lessee, and, as if there were claims for the effective lease deposit against I by the lessor, the Defendant was willing to deceive the borrower and receive the loan.

1. The Defendant provided the Defendant’s personal information to B and G, and B and G stated the column of deposit “Seoul Seongbuk-gu J Apartment 108 Dong 503, 503, located in the apartment charter contract in a place where the date is unknown in 2012.” The term of existence of “24 months from July 2, 2012 to July 1, 2014,” stating that “I” and “A” were written in the column of deposit “Seoul Seongbuk-gu J apartment 108 Dong 503, 100,000,” and affixed a seal in the name of I in advance.”

Accordingly, the defendant, in collusion with B, G, and H, forged one copy of the real estate lease agreement in the name of the I, a private document concerning rights and obligations without authority for the purpose of exercising.

2. On August 13, 2012, the Defendant, along with B and H, delivered to K a forged real estate lease agreement as stated in paragraph (1) at a coffee shop in Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (hereinafter referred to as the “Sadong-dong”) and exercised the aforementioned investigation document as if he/she genuinely completed the forgery.

3. The Defendant presented to the Victim K as if the date, time, place, as described in paragraph (2) with B, G, and H were the lessor as if he were the lessor I, and as if he were a document forged real estate lease contract, as described in paragraph (1), the Defendant presented to the victim K a false statement to the effect that “A house owner is I, and a house owner is I, and a house owner is 220 million won is able to live on a deposit basis, and thus a deposit is 20 million won as security, so he/she borrowed money as security,” and the Defendant received KRW 50 million from the victim on the same day, and KRW 20 million on September 10, 2012.

In this respect, the Defendant, B, G, and H.

arrow