(영문) 인천지방법원부천지원 2020.09.16 2020고단739

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 인천지방법원부천지원 2020.09.16 2020고단739

성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(카메라등이용촬영)등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

The defendant shall be ordered to complete the sexual assault treatment program for 80 hours.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant “2020 Highest 739” is the victim B (n, 50 years of age) and the victim B (n, 50 years of age) from July 2014 to December 2018.

1. On July 18, 2018, the Defendant violated the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes (Chomera, etc.) taken screen pictures of the victim’s body from a toilet in the state of body with his/her cell camera, without the consent of his/her woman, after completing shower within the cirrative telecom not exceeding Kimpo, Kimpo, 07:09.

Accordingly, the defendant taken the body of the victim who could cause sexual humiliation or shame by using the camera or other similar devices.

2. The Defendant, in violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes (obscenity using communications media), sent two audio-visual files containing the victim’s new and opportune messages to the victim, prior to the occurrence of sexual intercourses with the victim, at around 23:56, Sept. 14, 2019.

Accordingly, the Defendant sent a sound that may cause a sense of sexual humiliation or aversion to the victim through telephone, mail, computer, or other communication media for the purpose of inducing or meeting his or another person's sexual desire.

"200 Highest 1058"

1. Around October 22, 2019, the Defendant attempted to go to the public, at the “D” plant located in Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si (hereinafter “D”), sent a text message to the victim, stating that the Defendant would return KRW 10,00,000,000, out of the expenses paid during the course of joining the victim as a part of the expenses that he paid during the course of joining the victim, and that the Defendant was frighted to the mobile phone in the face of “nicking or consulting with the victim.” At the same time, the Defendant was frighted to the victim by sending the text message to the victim. There is no governance, and there is no need for other cases, and there is a lot of time to get back. There is no need to do so, and arranged only in money-related relationship.”

As above, the Defendant intending to attack the victim and deliver the property from the victim frighten.

유사 판례

-서울중앙지방법원 2015.05.22 2014고단8969

-광주지방법원 목포지원 2020.02.25 2019고단1433

-수원지방법원 평택지원 2014.08.06 2013고합120

-춘천지방법원 2019.02.12 2018고단1134

-인천지방법원 2020.01.08 2019고단4601