logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.08.10 2018고단3892
공무집행방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On March 21, 2018, the Defendant: (a) around 01:55 on March 21, 2018; (b) around 01:55, the Defendant: (c) opened a room in which he was an employee of the cartelter located in B; (d) opened a door to the victim C (at the age of 37; (c) opened the door to the main room; and (d) opened the door to the victim; and (d) opened the door to the main room; and (e) opened the door to the victim; and (e) led to sound.

Thus, the victim said that “the husband will open a door,” and the defendant would do so.

"................ .............................

Although the Defendant continued to have received a report 112 and heard the speech that he entered the room from a police officer dispatched, the Defendant was able to avoid a disturbance by repeating his scam flab, which read “I have no way to scam in his flab,” and making approximately 30 minutes scam.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the victim's motherel business by force.

2. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties at the date and time set forth in paragraph 1, and at the place set forth in paragraph 1, and after receiving a 112 report, listened to the horses that he would go to the room from D’s seat of the Gyeonggi-do Police Station, and wanting to go to the room, and thereby obstructing the performance of official duties.

“To make a bath,” and from D of the above circumstances, “to be punished as a disturbance of drinking and a interference with business.”

” 는 말을 듣게 되자, “ 씹할 놈!” 이라고 말하며 주먹으로 그의 가슴 부위를 1회 때렸다.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each written statement C, D, and E;

1. Application of CCTV-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties), Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing duties) and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Social service order under the Criminal Act;

arrow