A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On February 11, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around 14:10 on February 11, 2016, at the victim C’s window B operated by the victim C, caused the Defendant to pay the lost amount of money; (b) opened a Mour room, opened a door to the Mour room, or opened and opened the Mour room, and led to the Defendant to give money.

After that, the defendant reported to the police.

The victim shall be equipped with the "Sae-Sae-Sa-Sa-Sa-Sa-Sa-Sa-Sa-Sa-Sa-Sa-Sa-S

“The victim’s obscing theory,” and obstructed the victim’s Moscing business by force for approximately 40 minutes, such as prohibiting customers from coming to and departing from the corridor of the fifth floor of the Moscher.

2. On February 11, 2016, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties at the telecom specified in paragraph (1) around 15:15, and at the telecom described in paragraph (1) around 15, 2016, the Defendant, upon receiving a report of 112 from the Defendant, found that the slope of the police box belonging to the Changwon Police Station, dispatched by the Defendant, interfered with the business of the telecom.

For this reason, the police officer's 112 duty of reporting processing was interfered with the police officer's legitimate performance of duty.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement protocol against C and E;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing CCTV images;

1. Articles 314(1) and 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with the performance of official duties) concerning the facts constituting an offense and the choice of imprisonment, respectively;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. The scope of the final sentence due to the aggravation of the sentence of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act with the reason for sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution, for multiple crimes with no basic area (for six months to one year and six months) (for example, interference with the execution of official duties) (for six months to one year and six months) [the scope of recommended punishment] (for example, interference with the performance of official duties] (for six months to one year and four months), the basic area (for interference with the performance of official duties) (for six months to one year and four months) (for special sentencing), the scope of the final sentence due to the aggravation of multiple crimes with no primary area (for example, six months to one year and four months): Six months (for the decision of sentence), six months to two years [for the decision of sentence], and the age, sex, family relationship of the defendant, and