1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 6,275,00 to the Plaintiff (Appointed Party); (b) KRW 6,150,00 to the Selection C; and (c) KRW 5,064,00 to the Selection D; and

1. Where there is no dispute between the parties to the determination on the cause of the claim, or comprehensively taking account of the purport of Gap 1, 2 and all the arguments, the fact that the defendant worked as an employee of the plaintiff (appointed party; hereinafter referred to as "Plaintiff") and the representative G (from November 22, 2015 to February 27, 2016), Appointed D (from November 18, 2015 to February 27, 2016) (from February 18, 2016) and Appointed F (from November 28, 2015 to November 4, 2016) and E (Disposition Order 17, 2015) are not paid.

Therefore, the defendant is obligated to pay the above wages and damages for delay calculated at the rate of 20% per annum from January 19, 2016 (Appointed F) or from March 13, 2016 (excluding the appointed parties and the plaintiff) to the date of full payment, 14 days after the retirement of the plaintiff and the appointed parties.

2. The Defendant’s claim regarding the Defendant’s assertion: (a) the wage calculated according to the actual work volume by the Plaintiff and the designated parties in bad faith does not reach the wage claimed by the Plaintiff and the designated parties; and (b) thus, (c) the Plaintiff and the designated parties

The evidence Nos. 1 through 5 alone is insufficient to acknowledge the defendant's assertion, and even if the actual working volume of the plaintiff and the designated parties was insufficient as the defendant's assertion, such circumstance alone does not justify the act of not paying wages to the plaintiff and the designated parties. Thus, the defendant's assertion is rejected.