logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원홍성지원 2014.10.28 2013가단12297
임금
Text

1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 6,023,487; (b) KRW 5,471,125 to the appointed parties C; and (c) KRW 3,619,660 to the appointed parties D; and

Reasons

1. Determination on the cause of the claim

A. The facts that the plaintiff (Appointeds) and the designated parties were employed by the defendant for each period specified in the attached Table "period of service" column, and that the defendant did not pay the plaintiff (Appointeds) and the appointed parties wages and retirement allowances equivalent to the amount stated in the attached Table "interest and retirement allowances" column in the attached Table No. 1-1, 2, 1-1 through 6, 1-2, and 2 are recognized by considering the whole purport of the pleadings as a whole. Thus, the defendant is obligated to pay the plaintiff (Appointeds) and the appointed parties each money and delay damages stated in the "interest and retirement allowances" column in the attached Table No. 1-2, 1-2, 1-2, and 2, barring any special circumstances.

B. As to this, the Defendant asserts that the Plaintiff (Appointed Party) and the designated parties were unable to pay wages for the period of 176 days in the case of Plaintiff (Appointed Party), the designated parties D, 177 days in the case of Selection C, 174 days in the case of Selection Party E and F, 174 days in the case of Selection Party G, 180 days in the case of Selection Party G, and 180 days in the case of Selection G,

However, there is no evidence as to the fact that the Plaintiff (Appointed Party) and the designated parties did not provide labor after leaving the workplace as alleged by the Defendant, and rather, according to the evidence No. 2, the Defendant’s assertion is without merit since it can only be acknowledged that the Defendant was convicted of a fine of KRW 2,00,000 on the ground of the violation of the Labor Standards Act that the Plaintiff (Appointed Party) and the designated parties (excluding the appointed parties G) did not pay the wages and retirement allowances equivalent to each money as stated in the attached Table No. 2, the Defendant did not pay the wages and retirement allowances as stated in the attached Table No. 2, and the facts constituting the violation of the Guarantee of Workers’ Retirement Benefits

C. Therefore, the defendant's payment of unpaid wages to the plaintiff (appointed party) and the selected party, as stated in the column of "average wages and retirement allowances" as stated in the attached Table, as well as related thereto.

arrow