1. The Defendant: KRW 3,500,000 to the Plaintiff (Appointed Party); KRW 2,00,000 to the Selection C; KRW 5,900,00 to the Selection D; and

1. Comprehensively taking account of the purport of the entire argument in Gap evidence No. 1 as to the cause of the claim, even though the plaintiff (appointed party, hereinafter "the plaintiff") and the designated parties employed the defendant for each period indicated in the following table service period column, and provided labor, it can be acknowledged that each wage recorded in the table of overdue wages in the same table was not paid.

C. From June 22, 2015 to October 31, 2015, C. 2,000 to October 31, 2015; from May 18, 2015 to November 18, 2015; from May 18, 2015 to November 18, 2015; from May 18, 2015 to October 3, 2015; from May 10, 2015; from May 18, 2018 to May 18, 2015; from May 18, 2010 to May 18, 2015; from May 18, 2015 to May 10, 2018; from May 18, 2015 to May 18, 2018; and from May 18, 2015 to June 18, 2015 to June 2015.

2. The defendant's assertion regarding the defendant is the actual representative of the defendant, and the representative of the weather corporation, etc., K did not participate in the actual management, and thus the plaintiff cannot respond to the plaintiff's claim. However, the plaintiff is held liable for the defendant's liability under the labor contract concluded between the plaintiff and the selected person with the defendant, and the defendant's argument that confused the defendant's responsibility with the corporation and the representative director's personal responsibility does not

3. The plaintiff's claim for conclusion is accepted on the ground of the reasons.