logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2013.12.18 2013나23944
손해배상(의)
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On January 208, 2008, Plaintiff A was diagnosed as a disability to prevent detailed uncertainty due to Plaintiff A’s symptoms due to an inner shocking symptoms, and was administered by the Defendant on February 19, 2008 and February 20, 2008 on both sides of the eye on both sides of the eye on the two days.

B) On March 20, 2008, the Defendant confirmed that the fiber was created on the part of the Plaintiff’s 1’s treatment, 2008, and 15 April 16, 2008, and removed fiber tissues generated on both snow inside and outside of 10,000, and 200. The Defendant had confirmed that the Defendant was a brupter in front and outside of 10,000, and that the 1stal part of 20,000 square meters of 20,000 square meters of 20,000,000 won of 20,000,000 won of 20,000 won of 20,000,000 won of 20,000 won of 20,000,000 won of 20,000,000 won of 20,00 won of 30,000,000.

arrow