(영문) 부산지방법원 2013.02.22 2011가단124949

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 부산지방법원 2013.02.22 2011가단124949

손해배상(의)

Text

1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 14,918,312 to the Plaintiff; and (b) KRW 5% per annum from March 30, 2012 to February 22, 2013 to the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. 1) The defendant is "D Councilor" (hereinafter "Defendant Councilor") in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.

(2) The Plaintiff continued to be in a specialized department that is specialized in the state-state ties in the course of operating it, and continued to perform it. (2) The Plaintiff has been receiving medical treatment for a long time due to symptoms such as galging, shocking, and coloring of both snow, and was receiving medical treatment, and the Plaintiff was in the process of being in the process of being in the process of being in the process of being in the process of being in the process of being in the process of being in the process of being in the process of being in the process of being in the process of being in the process of being in the process of being in the process of being in the process of being in the process of being in the process of being in the treatment.

3) The Plaintiff was diagnosed through the scopic microscope test, etc. conducted on the day of internal origin that there was a diagnosis that there was a scopic change in both snow: (i) an inner scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic sc

(hereinafter referred to as "the instant procedure"). (b)

After the procedure of this case 1, the plaintiff et al.,

3. 29.4 The same year.

8. 20. In each of the 20. Members of the Defendant, he/she was under observation after the surgery and prescribed drugs, and the last time he/she was under the influence of drugs;

8. In a test conducted on 20. 20. The test was diagnosed to have no particular opinion on the other side of the left side, unless the blood transfusion seems to exist on the other side of the left side, and was given an instruction to re-examine the two months thereafter, except in extenuating circumstances.

2 The above

8. On March 21, 201, the Plaintiff, who had no contact since 20.20, appealed again to find Defendant Council members, and complained of the Plaintiff that snow pain had been serious since two days ago.

유사 판례

-서울중앙지방법원 2015.11.04 2013가단5109675

-서울중앙지방법원 2013.12.18 2013나23944

-서울중앙지방법원 2013.04.04 2011가단16866

-서울중앙지방법원 2021.04.14 2018가단5177222

-서울중앙지방법원 2017.08.25 2015가단5118789