The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

Costs of lawsuit shall be borne individually by each person.

Basic Facts

On September 1, 2017, at around 20:54, the Plaintiff suffered from mination and mination of the upper part of the upper part of the upper part of the upper part of the body, after getting a bicycle and getting a bicycle in the vicinity of Seopo-si in Seopo-si, Seopo-do.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). At the time of the instant accident, the Defendant carried out construction of sewage pipes in the vicinity of Seogpo-si, Seopo-do (hereinafter “D”).

[Ground of recognition] The plaintiff's assertion of the witness E's testimony and the purport of the whole pleadings was suffered by the defendant's construction site D's injury by getting a bicycle. The plaintiff suffered injury by getting a bicycle. The plaintiff's assertion of the defendant's construction site D is a witness's construction site. The plaintiff's statement of Gap's 9 through 14, 25, and 26 (including paper numbers).

The accident site of this case is that the defendant had been engaged in the construction of sewage pipes, so it was neglected without safety facilities, even though it is necessary to install a blocking room such as lighting facilities and fences.

The defendant neglected his duty of care by failing to take safety measures, etc., and the plaintiff suffered injury due to the defendant's breach of such duty of care.

Therefore, the defendant is liable to compensate the plaintiff for the damages suffered by the plaintiff.

Judgment

We examine whether the accident of this case occurred in D, the construction site of the defendant.

In light of the following circumstances, the evidence submitted by the Plaintiff alone is insufficient to acknowledge the fact that the instant accident occurred in D, a construction site of the Defendant, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it. In light of the following circumstances, the evidence submitted by the Plaintiff is insufficient to acknowledge the fact that the instant accident occurred in D, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

D is located on the side between the Do Seopo-si F (hereinafter referred to as the "F") and the 4th line road as shown in the attached Form.

At the time of the accident of this case, E, one of the plaintiffs, requested the English Education City 119 Center, and at the time, the above 119 Center.