Text
1. The Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant)’s obligation to pay insurance proceeds to the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) regarding the insured incident on the attached list.
Reasons
A principal lawsuit and counterclaim shall also be deemed to be a principal lawsuit and counterclaim.
1. Facts of recognition;
A. On April 8, 2011, the Plaintiff entered into an insurance contract with the Defendant, which concluded an insurance contract with respect to non-distribution Alphus Guarantee Insurance 1104 with the following content:
(hereinafter referred to as “instant insurance contract”). - The policyholder, the insured, and the beneficiary: the defendant-insurance period: the insurance premium from April 8, 201 to April 8, 2085: 50,000 won: the amount of insurance coverage for each insurance contract to be paid when a general injury occurs due to death or a disability after the death of a general injury (the maturity of 100 years old): 300,000,000 won;
B. According to the content of the instant insurance contract terms and conditions of the instant insurance contract (Article 1.1.4 of the General Provisions), the said terms and conditions provide that “if the period is not less than five years with respect to any temporarily occurring disability after the completion of treatment, it shall be determined by the market-based payment rate of 20% of the relevant disability payment rate.”
C. On November 11, 2012, the Defendant: (a) suffered from the injury of conical signboards escape certificates, etc. on the left-hand side of the bicycle; (b) incurred from the preservation and treatment on November 14, 2012; (c) suffered from the injury of the upper left-hand shoulder belts and the damage of power lines, etc. on the ground that the Defendant was going beyond the front-hand side of the ice ice shield and went beyond the upper left-hand side; and (d) suffered from the injury of the inner part of the conical shoulder belt and the damage of the power lines.
(hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”) D.
On November 14, 2012, the Defendant filed a claim for insurance proceeds with the Plaintiff for the payment of the insurance proceeds for the subsequent disability in accordance with the insurance contract of this case, asserting that the occurrence of an insured incident equivalent to the cryp escape certificate (10% of the payment rate) of a little number of conical signboards in accordance with the Disability Classification Table and the left-hand shoulder function (10% of the payment rate) by obtaining an operation of the crypary crypary crypary crypary crypary crypary crypary crypary crypary crypary crypary crypary crypary crypary crypary crypary cryp crypary cryp cryp cryp cryp c
[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1 to 4, respectively.