beta
Text
Defendant
C and B Co., Ltd. shall be punished by each fine of KRW 3 million, and each fine of KRW 1 million by Defendant A and D.
Defendant .
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
No resident of South Korea shall obtain approval for visit from the Minister of Unification by fraud or other improper means while visiting North Korea.
Nevertheless, the Defendants obtained the approval of the visit to North Korea through the F's clothing company B, which is the F's clothing company operated by Defendant C, and obtained the approval by unlawful means as follows.
1. In collusion with Defendant C and the Defendants on January 3, 201, in applying for approval of the visit to Defendant A at the office of Defendant C’s management company located in G at the time of strike, the fact was that the above Party A was not an employee of H, and obtained approval of visit by stating it falsely as “H” in the rectangular column even if it was not an employee of H, and obtained approval of visit by the same method 660 times from that time to July 19, 2013.
2. In collusion with Defendant C and Defendant D, the Defendants filed an application for approval of the visit to Defendant D at the office B office of Defendant C’s operation as indicated in the preceding paragraph around September 11, 2013, the fact was that the said D was not an employee of the said company, and obtained the visit approval by entering it falsely in the direct column as “B” even if the said D was not an employee of the said company, and obtained the visit approval by the same method over 371 times from that time, such as the two-year period table of crimes in the attached Table 2.
3. In applying for the approval of the visit to I at the office listed in paragraph (1) of May 18, 201, Defendant C applied for the approval of the visit to the Republic of Korea on the following occasions: (a) Defendant C obtained the approval of the visit to the North Korea in the same way 15 times from that time, including the fact that the said I was not an employee of H with a false statement on “H” as “H”, even if the said I was not an employee of H; and (b) obtained the approval of the visit in the same way as in attached Table 3 for all six persons, including I, J, K, L, M, and N, from August 29, 2013.
4. Defendant B, a representative of the Defendant, obtained the approval of the Defendant’s visit to North Korea in an unlawful manner as described in paragraphs (1) through (3).