The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., the form of punishment) of the lower court’s sentence against the Defendant is too unreasonable in light of the following: (a) the Defendant led to the confession of the instant crime and against the mistake, etc.

2. Determination

A. Prior to the judgment on the grounds of appeal by the defendant ex officio, the records show that the evidence of the Daejeon District Prosecutors' Office No. 2011-No. 1050 (No. 40-day, 46-day, and 2-day-day-day-day-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based--------based----------

B. We examine the determination on the assertion of unfair sentencing. The instant crime provides 45 game machines which the Defendant, from July 1, 2010 to July 4, 2010, to the sea, which is a speculative game machine, 39 game machines going to the sea in Pyeongtaek-si from August 26, 201 to August 30, 201, 42 game machines coming to the sea at the JJ from December 13, 201 to December 14, 201, and each customer, with points accumulated at the sea in the 40 game machines to the sea, from Jun. 14, 2011 to Jun. 16, 201.