logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2017.11.29 2017고단466
게임산업진흥에관한법률위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] On October 26, 2010, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Game Industry Promotion Act in the support of Suwon Fagwon, and the sentence on November 3, 2010 became final and conclusive on November 3, 201, for a period of two years after suspension of execution.

[2] The Defendant is a person operating a marine camping game room on the first floor of the building B in light of the name of light, without any trade name, while C (amended by a fine of KRW 3 million on July 15, 2010) serves as the term "the chief of the branch president" in the above game site and manages the above game site, and D (Suspension of Prosecution on May 27, 2010) is an employee of the above game site.

No one shall provide for the distribution or use of, or display or keep for, a game product that has not been rated, nor shall he/she use such a game product to exchange, exchange, arrange for exchange, or repurchase such tangible or intangible results obtained through the use of the game product for a business purpose, or engage in speculative activities by using slot machines or speculative gaming machines for a business purpose.

Nevertheless, the defendant in collusion with the above C, from February 20, 2010 to the same year.

3. Until February 2, 200, the sea open game machine 39 players, which was not classified as the classification of the head of the above game, are installed and provided for the use of unspecified customers, and customers receive money in cash equivalent to the remaining points obtained by deducting 10% of the accumulated score of the game machine acquired as a result of the game, and they run the speculative business using slot or speculative gaming machines.

Summary of Evidence

1. Five-time suspect interrogation protocol against C (including statement of the E) the police interrogation protocol;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspects of D;

1. Court rulings (430 pages of investigation records);

1. A protocol of seizure and a list of seizure;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of a reply to inquiry, such as criminal history, report on investigation (the confirmation of concurrent crimes after Article 37 of the Criminal Act), and text of judgment (434 pages of investigation records);

1. Relevant legal provisions and special cases concerning the regulation and punishment of criminal facts, such as selective speculative acts, etc.

arrow