logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2016. 01. 14. 선고 2015두52876 판결
(심리불속행) 명의신탁증여의제로 증여세 과세시 부당무신고 가산세적용가능한지 여부[일부국패]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court-2015-Nu-37305 (2015.09)

Title

(C) Whether it is possible to apply an unfair non-reported additional tax when a gift tax is levied as an agenda of title trust donation.

Summary

(C) Article 2(1) of the former Enforcement Decree of the former Enforcement Decree of the Securities and Exchange Act (amended by Presidential Decree No. 2010, Jan. 2, 2011) provides that the title trust of this case may be deemed as a basis for the penalty tax on the gift tax due to the constructive gift of the title trust of this case.

Related statutes

Article 45-2 of the Inheritance Tax and Gift Tax Act; Article 47 of the Framework Act on National Taxes

Cases

Supreme Court Decision 2015Du52876 Decided disposition imposing gift tax, etc.

Plaintiff-Appellant

Han △△△

Defendant-Appellee

○ Head of tax office

Judgment of the lower court

September 9, 2015

Imposition of Judgment

January 14, 2016

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the defendant.

Reasons

Examining the lower judgment and the grounds of appeal, the grounds of appeal by appellant are not included in the grounds of appeal under each subparagraph of Article 4(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Procedure for Appeal, or are deemed to fall under each subparagraph of paragraph (3). Therefore, the appeal is dismissed under Article 5 of the same Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by

arrow