The judgment below

Of the parts against Defendant Incheon Incheon corporation, this part of the case is reversed and this part of the case is remanded to the Seoul High Court.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

1. As to the ground of appeal by Defendant Incheon Diplomatic Corporation

A. The lower court’s judgment (1) based on evidence, found out that the Maz vehicle stops on the side of the Incheon Bridge, while the patrolman, who entered into a service contract for road management (hereinafter “Defendant Incheon Bridge”), including the point of the instant traffic accident, was in charge of the traffic accident connecting the Incheon Bridge, and found that the Maz vehicle stops on the side at approximately 800 meters before the Incheon Bridge, and that the Maz vehicle stops on the side, ② although the Maz Vehicle’s warning, etc. was confirmed to turn on, the Maz Vehicle was not aware of the reasons, the Maz Vehicle driver again stopped the vehicle to stop on the side while driving the vehicle on the side, and again stopped the vehicle on the side, and the Maz Vehicle driver was not able to inspect the vehicle at the speed of 40 km or 50 km or more, and the driver of the Maz vehicle was not able to stop the vehicle on the front of that vehicle.