logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 2016.05.11 2016고정27
사문서위조등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On August 11, 2011, the Defendant entered into a contract with D to take over “all rights and obligations arising from the development project of apartment units E and E, and ten parcels of apartment units” as the representative director of C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “C”, and the Defendant was planning to renew the said contract (hereinafter referred to as “instant contract”), but he was in dispute with D due to the failure to pay the down payment, etc. from August 2012, when electricity was required at the said construction site, D was willing to file an application for the use of electricity in the name of G, as if D entered into the subcontract for the new construction project in the name of the said apartment site.

On January 16, 2014, the Defendant called to the manager at the site of apartment construction in Ansan-si, and called to the H with the consent of D, and had already been given by F, the “public mission: the construction of the I Apartment-si, Ansan-si, and the construction site: The construction site of the I Apartment-si: 10 parcel and the contract amount: Ansan-si, the amount: the contractor’s trade name, G, and the contractor’s trade name: D’s employee identification number attached to the standard contract for private construction works (hereinafter “instant dispute contract”) under the name of H, and ordered H to submit the application for the approval of the use of the electricity prepared in G under the name of G to the Korea Electricity Corporation. At that time, H was unable to know that it did not actually consent to D’s contract for the dispute of this case and submitted the contract to the Korea Electric Power Branch.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant, without authority, forged a copy of the instant dispute agreement in the name of private document D, and exercised it.

Summary of Evidence

1. The legal statement of K Witness;

1. A protocol concerning examination of the suspect of a part of the prosecution against the defendant or H;

1. A copy of the contract of the dispute in this case, an employee reduction, etc.

arrow