A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On November 2014, the Defendant: (a) attempted to forge a written contract under the name of FF Co., Ltd. in order to receive supply of and demand for apartment housing construction built by C and D Co., Ltd.; and (b) intended to make F Co., Ltd. appear to have received the said construction work together with the Defendant.

On November 28, 2014, the Defendant entered into a contract for the said construction work with D Office located in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, the representative H and D representative I, and without authority. The Defendant, without authority, entered into a contract for the construction work of the standard contract for private construction work in the name of the site for the construction work. The Defendant, without authority, placed the official seal of the F Company in advance, i.e., the name of the site for the construction work of the contract for private construction work, i.e., the “S. E apartment construction work” on August 30, 2015, i.e., the date scheduled for completion, i., the “C” in 2 column, i.e., the “F Company” in the contractor’s trade name column, i., and i., the contractor’s trade name column.

Accordingly, the Defendant forged the standard contract for private construction works under the name of FF Co., Ltd. for the purpose of exercising.

2. At the time, at the place, at the foregoing paragraph (1) above, the Defendant copied the standard contract for private construction works under the name of F Co., Ltd. and delivered a copy thereof to C Representative H and D Representative I, each of whom is unaware of the fact.

3. The Defendant, on February 27, 2015, displayed the standard contract for private construction work contract under the name of the F Co., Ltd. under the name of the F Co., Ltd. that was forged under the said paragraph to the victim L, a steel-reined concrete construction business operator, around the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City around February 27, 2015, and the Defendant would conclude a subcontract because the steel-in concrete construction works exist in order to construct a rental apartment.

A false statement was made that the construction contract deposit amount is KRW 30 million.

However, in fact, since the above standard contract contract was forged as above 1, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to proceed with the above rental apartment construction.

The defendant belongs to this.