A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On November 12, 2008, the Defendant entered into a contract with the Defendant’s wife, D, E to enter into a standard contract for private construction works with the Defendant and the contractor, at the office located in the Seocheon City B, and entered into a contract for construction work with the Defendant, the contractor, despite the fact that the Defendant entered into a contract for the construction work with the Defendant’s wife, D to enter into a contract for the construction work with the Defendant. However, on May 2, 2016, the public service offices of the public service offices of the Gwangju District Public prosecutor’s office located in the office of the public service of the public service branch of the public service office of the Gwangju District public prosecutor’s office located in the 19th City, Seocheon-si, the Defendant forged the above contract in the name of the Defendant by means of D, E, and submitted a forged contract for the payment order against the Defendant on October 20, 2015.

Accordingly, the Defendant submitted a false complaint with the aim of having D and G subject to criminal punishment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of the witness D;

1. Standard contract for accusation and private construction works;

1. In light of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the Supreme Prosecutors' Office, the Defendant's seal impression affixed on the standard contract for private construction works (hereinafter "the contract of this case") is highly likely to be identical to the Defendant's seal impression as well as the Defendant's seal impression. The Defendant, while acting on behalf of D for D with the application for authorization and permission related to interior interior interior interior interior interior interior interior interior interior interior interior interior interior construction, left the place of seal impression to D with the seal impression, and it is presumed that D voluntarily affixed to the contract of this case. However, there is no objective material to support it, and D is consistent with this law from the investigation agency to the investigation agency to this court, and the contract for construction is concluded at its own office located on November 12, 2008 with four persons, including the Defendant, Defendant's wife, D, and E employees.