logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 마산지원 2017.03.29 2016고단1255
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On April 10, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to ten months of imprisonment for fraud, and two years of probation on November 1, 2014, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on May 16, 2014. On May 16, 2014, the Daegu District Court sentenced four months of imprisonment for fraud, and one year of suspension of execution, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on May 24, 2014. On November 19, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment for fraud and two years of suspension of execution, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on November 27, 2015.

1. The Defendant was aware of his knowledge of around August 10, 201, regarding the issuance of a credit card.

C In mind to be issued with a credit card using the personal information of C, the victim Samsung Card’s name-free card solicitors were applied for the issuance of a credit card using C’s personal information. In the office of the defendant in Daegu Seo-gu, the defendant’s office operated by the defendant in Daegu Seo-gu, the victim’s company was suffering from the telephone identifying C himself/herself from the above victim’s company, and the completion was of usual knowledge while the defendant was in office as C.

C's personal information was put in place.

As above, the Defendant was issued a copy of Samsung Card in the name of Samsung Card Co., Ltd. by deceiving employees in the name of the victim Samsung Card Co., Ltd.

2. The Defendant in violation of the Act on the Financial Industry, as stated in the foregoing paragraph 1, committed as if he had a credit card acquired by deceiving Samsung Card, as if he were C, and had no intent or ability to pay the price normally, the Defendant acquired the pecuniary profit of KRW 16,721,085 in total on August 21, 2012 from around the above day to September 17, 2013, in order to purchase the victim’s name unclaimed box’s KRW 36,800 from the course of operating the Daegu Singu Sin-gu, Daegu-si, Daegu-si, to purchase the goods with a credit card of KRW 36,80,00 with a credit card of the victim Samsung Card.

3. The above paragraph (1) shall apply to the Defendant in violation of the Act on thief and credit finance business.

arrow