1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs and the defendant G, Gyeongnam-do, Gyeong Young-si, and Gyeongnam-do yachts Association are dismissed.

2...

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as follows, except for modification of some of the judgment of the court of first instance or addition of the judgment of the court of first instance, and therefore, it is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, it is citing this as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420

The 5th page 5's "on the face" refers to the "on the face."

The 6th parallel of the 5th parallel " approximately 70m feet 2 line in diameter" is "not less than 70m synthetic resin 2 line in diameter."

Part 6 8 deleted the above two vessels.

From the 7th page, each of the vessels of this case is referred to as “each of the vessels of this case” as “the on the side of the sea-going vessel of this case.”

Part 8, the "accident" in Part 6 is the "accident of this case".

Part 8 Sheet 11 to 13 add "Evidence 26, 27, 28, Eul's 3 through 6, Eul's 22, 27, and 28 to "the grounds for recognition".

The defendant's "defendants" in Chapter 5, 6, and 7 are referred to as the "defendants".

Part 15, Paragraph 2, deleted.

Part 8 and 9 of the 17th 8 and the 9th 9th 19th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 8th 8th 8th 8th 8th 8th 8th 8th 8th 8th 8th 8th 8th 8th 8th 8th 8th 8th 8th 8th 8th 196.

Part 20 provides that "I implemented" in Part 2.

Part 10 to 13 of Chapter 22, the phrase “(3) S-03 naval vessels ought to go through or appear at the scene of the instant accident” is deemed as follows: “The 122 rescue unit slab boat, which arrives at the scene of the instant accident before around 14:20, prior to the arrival of S-03 naval vessels at the site of the instant accident, went away from the site on the ground of the recruitment of rescue staff, etc., and the Defendant G attempted to rescue the deceased.”

CHAPTER 25, 7 through 26.