1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

1. The grounds alleged by the defendant in the trial of the court of first instance are not significantly different from the allegations in the court of first instance, and even if the evidence submitted in the trial is newly examined, the defendant's assertion is rejected, and the judgment of the court of first instance which partially accepted the plaintiff's claim in this case is recognized as legitimate.

Therefore, the court's explanation on this case is consistent with the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance except for the following "2." As such, Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act are cited as it is.

2. The dismissal of the judgment of the court of first instance in the same part is the "Seoul Administrative Court" in the 5th, 17th, and 13th of the 5th, 5th, 17th of the 13th.

On the 6th part of the first instance judgment, the "Seoul High Court" and the 7th part of the 6th part of the 6th part of the 6th part of the 7th part of the 6th part of the 1

Part 7 of the judgment of the court of first instance, the "Evidence A1 through 4" in Part 7 of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be deemed as "Evidence A1 through 4, 7, 8".

The letter of the judgment of the court of first instance, No. 7, 16, "private person" shall be dismissed as "private person".

The "International Ship Registration Act" in the 7th, 21th, 8th, 9th, and 8th of the first instance judgment shall be amended as the "former International Ship Registration Act".

The 10th page 9 of the first instance judgment “as shown in paragraph (2)” shall be deleted.

The second page of the judgment of the court of first instance, on the 13th page, "the plaintiff" is regarded as "the plaintiff".

No. 13 of the first instance judgment, “Insufficiently insufficient” of the 12th sentence of the 13th judgment, is found to be “not sufficient to recognize, and it is not sufficient to recognize only by the written statements in the 5 and 6th (including each number).”

3. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.