beta
Text
Defendant
B Imprisonment for two years, for one year and six months, and for one year and one year, for Defendant C, respectively.
(b).
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. Defendant B, C, and D’s position: (a) an intermediate merchant who imports any forged trademark attached and sells it to the merchants of the S market to the merchants of the S market; (b) the Defendant C is a person engaged in the business of reporting the import information, etc. on the goods bearing the forged trademark to the owner of the trademark right, customs house, etc.; and (c) the Defendant D sells the goods bearing the forged trademark in the S market.
2. Defendant B, C
A. Although a person in violation of the Customs Act is prohibited from importing foreign goods different from those reported to the customs office, Defendant B and C conspired with each other, (1) on July 29, 201, to be scheduled to import interest from China in the name of T (U) on the AB Customs office on July 29, 201, and in fact, 1,308 old hazardous trademark (the cost is equivalent to KRW 29,22,968, the market price is equivalent to KRW 41,294,32), including the import of goods different from those reported to the customs office, from July 29, 201 to September 26, 201, by means of the same method.
1. As described in paragraphs 1 through 6, 8,347 (the cost shall be equivalent to KRW 203,023,773, the market price shall be equivalent to KRW 285,485,325) such as a bags on which a forged hazardous product trademark is attached at least six times, and (2) it is deemed that a PP note is to be imported in the name of AB Customs on October 11, 2010, and in fact, a list of crimes committed in attached Form;
1. Although a person intends to import 1,374 (the cost shall be equivalent to KRW 201,472,228, and the market price shall be 286,565,890, such as a bank with a forged or falsified trademark mentioned in paragraph 7 attached, he/she did not have attempted to import such a fact in the course of customs clearance.
B. While a person violating the Trademark Act is prohibited from using or possessing a trademark identical or similar to another person’s registered trademark on goods identical or similar to the designated goods, Defendant B and C in collusion with the owner of the trademark right at Pyeongtaek-si on July 29, 201.