beta
Text
1. The Plaintiff:
A. Defendant B Co., Ltd. shall be KRW 50,000,000 and its payment shall be from October 1, 2004 to the date of complete payment.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. On November 4, 2004, E entered into an asset transfer agreement with F Co., Ltd. and took over all rights and obligations under the credit transaction agreement with F Co., Ltd. to Defendant B Co., Ltd. and joint and several surety C and C Co., Ltd., a joint and several surety, and filed a lawsuit against Defendant B, C, and G with Seoul Central District Court 2008Gadan234404, and on August 21, 2008, “the Defendant jointly and severally paid to the Plaintiff the amount of KRW 50 million and the amount of KRW 19% per annum from October 1, 2004 to the date of full payment,” and the above judgment became final and conclusive at that time.
B. On April 26, 2011, Co., Ltd. transferred the above bonds to the Plaintiff and notified it to Defendant B around that time.
C. Meanwhile, C died on January 7, 2018, and as the deceased’s inheritor, H and Defendant D were children, and H reported the renunciation of inheritance by the District Court 2018-Ma222, and H reported the renunciation of inheritance by the above court on July 2, 2018, the deceased’s heir became Defendant D.
Defendant D applied for the approval of the re-determination of inheritance under the Do Government District Court 2018Ra221, and the above court tried to accept it on April 24, 2018, and the above judgment became final and conclusive around that time.
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4, Eul evidence Nos. 1, 2 and 3, and the purport of the whole pleadings
2. According to the facts of the above recognition, Defendant B, Co., Ltd., and the damages for delay calculated at the rate of 19% per annum from October 1, 2004 to the date of full payment, and Defendant D, jointly and severally with Defendant B, within the scope of the property inherited from the network C, are liable to pay the above money.
3. The plaintiff's claim against the defendants is justified and it is so decided as per Disposition.