1. The Plaintiff:

A. Defendant A Co., Ltd. and Defendant B shall be jointly and severally liable for KRW 50,000,000 and the defendant.

1. The facts of recognition, as indicated in the separate sheet No. 1, and the changes (the cause of the claim changed) of the cause of the claim, and the facts that Defendant C, D, and E, the inheritor of the network F, obtained an inheritance limited approval as of July 18, 2006 by the Seoul Family Court Decision 2006Ra-Ma5064 on July 18, 2006, are not in dispute between the parties, or the entire purport of the arguments No. 1 through No. 3, and No. 1, can be acknowledged by revealing the overall purport of

2. According to the above facts of recognition, Defendant A Co., Ltd. and B jointly and severally seek 50,000,000 won, and Defendant A Co., Ltd., from July 8, 2015, the day following the delivery date of the application for modification of the lawsuit in this case, and Defendant B is obligated to pay 20% interest per annum from August 19, 2015, the day following the delivery date of the application for modification to the lawsuit in this case to the day of complete payment. Defendant C, D, and E, as the heir of the networkF, are jointly and severally with Defendant A Co., Ltd, and B, within the scope of property inherited from the networkF, and jointly and severally with Defendant C, D, and E, within the scope of property inherited from the networkF, pay 21,428,571 won and interest per annum 20% interest per annum from August 13, 2015 to the day following the delivery date of the application for modification to the lawsuit in this case, Defendant D, 14, 2815% and 215%.

3. In conclusion, the Plaintiff’s claims against Defendant A, B, and C are accepted on the grounds of their reasoning, and the claims against Defendant D and E are accepted within the scope of the above recognition, and the Plaintiff expressed his/her intent to reduce the claims within the scope of the property inherited from the networkF to Defendant D and E, who were absent on the date of the closing of argument in the instant case. However, the above Defendants’ consent or consent is deemed to be acceptable.