logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.07.16 2014가합15625
손해배상
Text

1. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

Basic Facts

The plaintiff company member of defendant B and C is a company that runs a comprehensive construction business mainly with the construction of wooden houses.

Defendant B, who was an officer of SK Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “SK Construction”), was employed as the Plaintiff’s representative director from April 201 to July 2013.

Defendant D also was from the head of SK Construction division, and was employed by Defendant B as the head of the Plaintiff’s business team from July 201 to July 201.

On November 12, 2012, the Plaintiff and E, F, G, etc. tried to newly build a new building site in the direction of the owner (including additional taxes) of the construction site, the size of the construction site, the size of the construction site, the size of the construction site, the 386,868,61 kilometer 38,619 on the ground and the 4th floor (including value added taxes) on November 12, 2012, 12, the Plaintiff and E, E, E, F, and G, the owner of the building (contractor) who is the contracting date for the construction contract, and the construction cost, and the 386,863,537 won (including value added taxes) on September 14, 2012, including the 1st, 50 square meters of the underground floor and the 386,86363,537 square meters of the existing building site in the direction of the construction construction site, the construction cost of the construction site, the 431.720,000,000 square meters of G.45.

As a part of such business expansion, the Plaintiff entered into each of the following construction contracts (hereinafter “each of the instant contracts”) with the owner E, I, F, G on the basis of the approval of Defendant D and the representative director, who is the head of H’s draft and team in charge of the business team, and Defendant B.

Since then, the Plaintiff subcontracted the construction work contracted by the above owner E and I to Q (hereinafter “S”), and the construction work contracted by the above owner F and G to the above owner F and Q (hereinafter “S”), and the “W” indicated as the subcontractor in each subcontract agreement for the construction work contracted by the F and G is an enterprise to lend the name of the subcontractor, and the actual construction work performed by the S.

The above small concrete.

arrow