A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On September 14, 2010, the defendant was a disguised marriage broker with a record of being punished by a fine of three million won due to the crime of false entry in public electronic records, etc. at the Incheon District Court.

In the case of foreigners, the defendant, using the fact that the registration of marriage in the family relations register of the Republic of Korea is possible, would receive KRW 12 million from the foreigner of the nationality of the fatherland who wants to make a disguised marriage with the Korean citizen, and introduced C as a national, and prepared documents necessary for the report of marriage with the above person to enter into a disguised marriage.

Accordingly, around February 29, 2008, B and C prepared a false marriage report by entering personal information, such as the names, dates of birth, and addresses of the married party B (D) and C (EE and women) of the native nationality in the column of the married party of the government viewing family register, which was kept there, around February 29, 2008, and submitted it to the public official in charge of the above family register management system and had the public official record it in the family register information management system, along with related documents, such as the unmarried notarial documents sent by the Thailand, and around that time, it made it possible to peruse and print the family register information system that contains false facts.

Accordingly, the defendant, in collusion with B and C, made a false report to the public official, made a false report to enter false facts in the family register information system, which is a public electronic record, and exercised a public electronic record stating false facts.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each prosecutor's office and police interrogation protocol of the accused, B, and C;

1. Marriage relation certificate:

1. Application of the statutes as a copy of marriage relation report;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Articles 228 (1), 229 and 30 of the Criminal Act concerning the choice of criminal facts;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Consideration of crimes, relationship of criminal records, etc.);