1. The judgment of the first instance court, including the plaintiffs' claims expanded in the trial, shall be modified as follows:

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation on this part of the facts is as follows: “Plaintiffs, including the plaintiff,” “Defendant employees,” “Defendant 1, 207.11.27” of the first instance judgment “8; “1.26, 2006.11.25, 2006.11.25”; “201.15, Nov. 25, 2006.” “2014.7, 254.4” of the first instance judgment at the end of 10, “2014, 27.3” of the first instance judgment; “2014, 11.3” of the first instance judgment was declared as “the date on which the first instance judgment was issued by the first instance court after conviction in the criminal case,” “the pertinent part of the judgment No.51, 15.4,” and “the pertinent part of the judgment, 5.15, 5,005,” and “the pertinent part of the judgment, 15, 5.5,” of the judgment.1.5.

2. Summary of the plaintiffs' assertion

A. 1) Claim for confirmation of nullity 1) The Plaintiffs offered money and valuables to Q and P, and received no information and answers about promotion examinations, and successfully passed the promotion examination. Accordingly, the grounds for disciplinary action and grounds for cancellation of promotion against the Plaintiffs are invalid on March 3, 2014, each of the instant dismissal dispositions against the Plaintiffs and the cancellation of the instant personnel order are invalid. 2) The revocation of the instant personnel order as to the existence of grounds for cancellation of the instant personnel order return to the class before promotion. As such, the Defendant’s personnel regulations do not provide grounds for cancellation of the personnel order, and the Defendant’s personnel regulations do not provide for the above disciplinary action.