1. All appeals by the defendant against the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

purport, purport, and.

1. Quotation and conclusion of the judgment of the court of first instance

A. Based on the litigation materials and arguments submitted to the appellate court citing the judgment of the court of first instance, the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance (such as law, precedents, interpretation and application of legal principles, recognition of facts and facts requiring proof, and determination of issues) is sufficiently reasonable.

The reasoning of this Court concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance, except for cases of cutting down or adding as described in the following Paragraph 2. Thus, this Court shall accept the summary, including the summary, pursuant to the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

B. If so, the plaintiffs' claims should be accepted as reasonable.

The judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the defendant's appeal is without merit.

Therefore, all appeals by the defendant against the plaintiffs are dismissed, and it is so decided as per Disposition.

2. All "G Co., Ltd.," in the second last parallel of the first parallel of the "G Co., Ltd.," in the third parallel of the former, "G Co.,, Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "G")" and "G" shall be incorporated into "G Co.,, Ltd.".

The "T Co., Ltd." in Part 6 of the 6th one shall be "T Co., Ltd.", the "V Co., Ltd." in Part 13 of the same side shall be "VAB", and the "W Co., Ltd." in the same side and not more than 15 "WABA" shall be filed in each form

The Minister of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs (hereinafter referred to as "3., 4., 5., and 6.") shall be subject to each of "4., 5., 6., and 7."

The summary of the plaintiffs' claims in Part 8 of the 8th 23th 23 is "the grounds for the plaintiffs' claims".

(1) On August 12, 200, the defendant's summary of the defendant's assertion (i.e., the claim for extinctive prescription due to the denial of membership) held on August 12, 200, by the G Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd. (the creditors who received membership in lieu of repayment from the G Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd.) held on August 14, 200

[2] The assembly (the plaintiff D also attended)

in this chapter, G. G.R.