1.The judgment of the first instance shall be modified as follows:

The defendant shall pay to the plaintiff 5,042,825,275 won and 5,025,323.

1. The reasons for the court’s explanation concerning this case are as follows: (a) the court’s ruling of the first instance is dismissed, modified, or added as stated in the following subparagraphs; and (b) the judgment of the first instance is as stated in the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, except for addition of the judgment of the first instance as stated in paragraph (2).

In general, the first instance court's decision No. 9 of the third 3, ".... were notified", and the plaintiff's consortium submitted a report of commencement to the head of Mapo-gu, Seoul on December 7, 2010. The plaintiff sent 20,21 to the head of Mapo-gu, Seoul, and the part below "...." The 11 letter No. 45 and Eul No. 13 ". 4," the 14th 3rd 3rd 14 and the 14th 2nd 10th 200 "the defendant's 2nd 10th 2nd 10, the 14th 3rd 16th 17th 19, "the defendant's 10th 2nd 2nd 10th 2nd 20, the "the defendant's 10th 2nd 2nd 10th 2nd 10th 2nd 3th 3th 2010."

B. The date of occurrence of the duty to pay land use fees, etc., of the first instance court’s decision No. 10, No. 19 of the relevant No. 110, supra, sent the “s...................,” and the time of termination of the agreement was indicated as “the public notice and the January 23, 2014,” and the sales contract of this case under Chapter 8 of the first instance court’s “the instant sales contract” thereafter.