beta
Text
1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 20,000,000 to Plaintiff A; (b) KRW 5,000,000 to Plaintiff B; and (c) from December 17, 2016 to December 2017 to each of the above amounts.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The Plaintiffs are legally married couple who completed a marriage report on April 23, 2002. They have one woman under the chain of law.
B. On May 2013, Plaintiff B and the Defendant committed an unlawful act while requesting a certified judicial scrivener working for Plaintiff B to perform real estate transaction affairs.
C. From March 2, 2014 to November 12, 2014, Plaintiff B was urged to contact the Defendant that he would no longer meet, the Defendant, from March 2, 2014 to around November 2, 2014, sent text messages that cause uneasiness as described in the attached Table 1 to the Plaintiffs. The Defendant was prosecuted for the above criminal facts and was sentenced to a fine of one million won by this court on June 4, 2015 (this Court Decision 2015No99), and the Defendant withdrawn the appeal on July 6, 2015 and became final and conclusive.
In addition, around February 25, 2015, the defendant sent the plaintiff B with the intention to handle the work within the country, so that it is responsible and resolved. It is found that the defendant sent the money to the account.
D. From June 28, 2016 to June 28, 2016, the Defendant received text messages that cause fear or apprehensions through 19 times in total, such as the entry in the list of crimes No. 2, and received repeatedly a sentence of imprisonment with prison labor for 1 year, a fine of 90,000 won was sentenced by this Court on October 28, 2016 (including this Court's High Court's High Court's High Court's High Court's High Court's High Court's High Court's High Court's High Court's High Court's High Court's High Court's High Court's High Court's High Court's High Court's High Court's High Court's High Court's High Court's High Court's High Court's High Court's High Court's High Court's High Court's High Court's High Court's High Court's High Court's High Court's High Court's High Court's High Court's High Court's High Court's High Court's High Court'
[This Court 2016No204, 514 (Consolidation)] / [Grounds for recognition] Party A’s each entry of evidence Nos. 1 through 11, and the purport of the whole pleadings
2. According to the above facts of recognition, the defendant not only participated in the plaintiff A's spouse's illegal acts but also promulgated against the plaintiffs.