logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2013.05.24 2013고단671
정보통신망이용촉진및정보보호등에관한법률위반
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The Defendant of the instant facts charged is a person who operates a mobile phone store B, Ocheon-gu, Ocheon-si, and is a mobile phone F with the victim E (the age of 43) using D admitted in the name of the Defendant C, the wife of the Defendant.

A. On June 19, 2012, around 23:14, around 2012: (a) there is a word that arouses apprehension that “Igel. Igel to find only one time, E Chewing, and that Igman E e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e.

B. On June 19, 2012: (a) around 23:16, 2012, there is a word that arouses apprehensions; (b) “I am going to know about. I am going to know about it; I am to find about it”; and (c) I am to reach a sense of apprehensions;

C. On June 20, 2012, around 04:35, 2012, there is a word that arouses apprehensions of the content that “the opening of a dogmatic dog is added to the dogmatic dog, as well as the dogmatic dog,” and that:

D. On June 20, 2012, around 04:37, 2012, there is a word “a person who desires to do so by less than a single-bresh so as to do so” containing a sense of apprehension; and

E. On June 20, 2012, around 04:40 on June 20, 2012, there is a word that arouses the apprehension of the content that “Iskn't kn't kn't kn't kn't kn't kn't kn't

(f) 2012

6. On 20.11:24 around 20. 11:24, “Saeman Ieman Ieman” has reached an uneasiness;

(g) 2012

6. Around 20:11:26, there is a word that arouses apprehension that “in front of the network recognition that the head of the well-fash fash fash fash fash fash fash,” is fashing, “in front of the network recognition”;

(h) 2012

6. At around 20:11:29, the text messages “the flag is received and caused to be found by the gugue fraud” sent by the transmission of text messages containing “the flag,” thereby reaching repeatedly the text causing uneasiness through an information and communications network.

2. On April 19, 2013, the date the instant indictment was instituted by the victim E, the Defendant’s withdrawal of the Defendant’s intent to punish the Defendant, Article 327 Subparag. 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act, and the promotion of the use of information and communications networks and information protection.

arrow