Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 1,500,000, and by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

The Defendants respectively.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A and Defendant B are between the two types, and the victim C(25) is between the defendant B and the defendant B.

The Defendants on June 26, 2016 at the front of the E cafeteria located in South South D around 01:35 on June 26, 2016, Defendant B was crypted by the victim “F the cryp, if the cryp, the cryp cryp

F Dogne Dogne Dogne Dogne Dogne

For the reason that “the victim’s face and head are taken several times due to drinking and hair,” and Defendant A told the victim and Defendant B’s fighting with the victim and Defendant B’s face two times due to drinking by drinking. As the victim and Defendant B’s fighting were made fit to drinking by drinking from the victim, the victim’s face was taken twice by drinking.

In the end, the Defendants jointly inflicted injury on the victim, such as a ductal fel, which requires approximately four weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Entry of C in the protocol concerning the interrogation of suspect B by the prosecution;

1. Statement of the police statement related to G;

1. Each investigation report (the sequence 12, 13 of the evidence list);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to records of emergency department treatment;

1. Article 2 (2) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense; and Article 25 of the same Act concerning the selection of a sentence;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act for the attraction of a workhouse;

1. Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act provides that the degree of injury of the victim for the reason of sentencing of the sentencing of the provisional payment order is disadvantageous to the Defendants; however, the Defendants recognized the instant crime; Defendant B was the first offender; Defendant A was involved in the instant crime in the course of a dispute with the victim known to the general public; Defendant A was involved in the instant crime in the course of a verbal dispute; Defendant A was not deemed to have been unilaterally assaulted by the Defendants at the time, and the victim was not deemed to have been unilaterally committed by the Defendants; Defendant A paid KRW 990,000 to the victim for the purpose of payment; and Defendant A agreed with the victim.