logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2017.11.30 2017고단4538
상해
Text

Defendant

A A A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000, and a fine of KRW 700,000.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A, on October 1, 2017, was unable to make a usual appraisal with the victim B (25 taxes) on the front side of Gwangju Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Gwangju around 04:25 on October 1, 2017.

As the term “the victim’s breath was read as “,” the victim’s breath was shafed with breath, and the victim’s breath by drinking twice, and the victim’s breath was inflicted an injury on the number of days of treatment for the victim to avoid breath on the part of the breath.

2. Defendant B, at the time and place specified in the above 1.1. At the same time and place, against the victim A (23.C) as indicated in the same paragraph, was scambling the victim’s breath with breath, and was inflicted an injury on the victim’s breath as a result of drinking twice the victim’s breath, and the victim’s breath caused the victim’s injury on the number of days of treatment that the victim

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Application of statutes on the photograph of the case

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act regarding criminal facts, the choice of fines for each crime (including the pening of errors, the fact that the defendants who had long been aware of the fact has committed contingent crimes under the influence of alcohol, the fact that they have long been a crime under the influence of alcohol, the fact that they have agreed with each other, and the fact that Defendant B is an initial offender)

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act for the attraction of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, applicable to the order of provisional payment;

arrow