A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for four months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On March 27, 2017, at around 03:30 on March 27, 2017, the Defendant was requested to verify the personal information, etc. from the police slope E by the police officer belonging to the Dobong-gu Seoul Police Station who was called up after receiving 112 a report that the Si expenses were punished in front of the D main office located in Dobong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Seoul, and the Defendant raised an objection against it.

Does this arg, “I have been why the police has been why it was darged;

Dun's natives threatened with Domine or Domine, "I am son," and the above E was made several times due to drinking.

On the same day, the Defendant continued to assault the Defendant, who was waiting to be arrested as the current offender of the crime of interference with the performance of official duties in the F box, and was faced with the cell phone E while waiting for an investigation.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each investigation report (reporter and witness telephone search);

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of punishment for the crime;

1. Deposit of a certain amount with the police officer who has failed to have the criminal history of the same kind of crime, or has failed to deposit such amount with the necessity of strict delegation of obstructing the execution of official duties for the reason of sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;