A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On September 21, 2015, at around 23:45, the Defendant 23:45, at the main point of “C”, the Defendant 112 reported on the assault case that occurred between the Defendant and other customers, and the circumstances E of the police box belonging to the intended police station, the security guards F, who asked the Defendant of his personal information and the circumstances of the case, etc., shall do so, “I see, see, see, and see”, “I see, and see,” and “I see, die,” and spathed into the face of the above securityF.

As a result, the Defendant assaulted security E and security guard F, and interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning criminal investigations.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of E and F;

1. G statements;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime concerned;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. The grounds for sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended sentence [Scope of Recommendation] The scope of final sentence due to the aggravated punishment of multiple offenders who have no basic area (six to one year and four months): the basic area (six to one year and four months) of the obstruction of performance of official duties (special person): the sentence shall be determined as per the order, taking into account the criminal records, age, character and conduct, circumstances of the case, etc.