beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment of 8 months, Defendant B’s imprisonment of 1 year and 6 months, and fine of 20,000,000, and Defendant C’s imprisonment of 10 months and more.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
A on December 20, 2007, in the Cheongju District Court Assistance to the Cheongju District Court, sentenced 1 year and 6 months of the suspension of execution to a violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc., and sentenced 10 months of imprisonment at the Cheongju District Court on November 3, 2009 due to a violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc. (hereinafter referred to as the "Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc."), which became final and conclusive on March 11, 2010, the sentence of the suspension of execution was invalidated. On April 29, 2010, the Cheongju District Court sentenced 2 months of imprisonment to a violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc. ( native) and completed the execution of the final sentence in the Daegu Prison District Court on January 15, 2012.
Defendant
B On June 5, 2015, the Cheongju District Court sentenced one year and six months to a violation of the Korean Racing Act, etc., and the said judgment became final and conclusive. Defendant C was sentenced to four months imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Korean Racing Act at the Cheongju District Court on June 5, 2015, and the said judgment became final and conclusive.
1. Defendants A, B, and C conspired with each other to establish a private horse horse J on October 1, 201 by using computers and monitors at the Iel located in Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-si. From around that time to May 31, 2015, the Defendants recruited from the above site users, and from May 31, 2015, the Defendants received the payment of horse tickets through each account indicated below the Defendants used from the above site users, and then sold horse tickets equivalent to the price to the above site users again. In the event the above site users sold horse-riding tickets by granting the horse-riding tickets to pay the same amount as the dividend rate of the racing at the Korean Racing Association, and thus, it is obvious that the Defendants were erroneous in the above calculation as above.
(See the table of “Concurrent Imposition of Additional Collection and Fines”). A reasonable amount of marina money has been acquired.
Accordingly, the Defendants are the defendants.