The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. From among the injuries suffered by the victim D of a mistake of facts, the luxalum and the luxalum are recognized as having causal link with the Defendant’s assault act, and the right luxum and the right luxalum exceed the extent naturally cured upon the lapse of the trial. Therefore, the lower court erred by misapprehending the legal principles on the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, etc. of Specific Crimes, even though the injury

B. The sentence of imprisonment (one year of imprisonment, two years of suspended execution) imposed by the lower court on the assertion of unfair sentencing is too uneasible and unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. A. On June 24, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 22:30 on June 24, 2014, the summary of this part of the facts charged was found to have been aware of the following facts: (b) around 22:30, the Defendant 1 was on board the E-si operated by the victim D (the age of 46) in the vicinity of Jongno-gu, Jongno-gu, Seoul; and (c) on the road facing Yongsan-gu, Yongsan-gu, Seoul; (d) expressed a bath for the victim on the ground that he returned to another way; and (e) took back the back and face of the victim on his hand; and (e) 112 reported the victim’s head at one time after the victim stopped the taxi, the Defendant had the victim take care of the victim’s head at one time, and had the victim take care of the injury, i.e., e., the victim’s face at one time after the victim’s oral examination of the victim; and (e) 1) reported the victim’s face.