logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2016.06.03 2015구단51913
추가상병요양 불승인 처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On February 8, 2010, the Plaintiff is a public official of Grade VII in the correctional position. Around February 18, 2010, the Plaintiff was working for at least 18:50, and was trying to turn to the left at a three-distance intersection in the Mapo-gu Daejeon Metropolitan City, Seo-gu, Daejeon, while trying to turn to the left at the three-distance intersection in the Do, Seo-gu, Daejeon. A vehicle stop according to the vehicle stop signal, and was led to a traffic accident (hereinafter “instant accident”).

B. On May 6, 2010, the Plaintiff was diagnosed as “satise satises, satise satises and tension, satise satise satise satise satise satise satise satise, satise satise satise satise, satise satise satis, the right satise satise

C. On May 26, 2010, the Defendant approved medical care for official duties with respect to “the field of satise, satise, satise base and tension, satise base and tension,” but, on the ground that it is difficult to recognize a proximate causal relation with the official duties with respect to “the external stress disorder, right-hand stress disorder, satise escape certificate No. 4-5, and satiseical signboard escape certificate No. 5-6.”

On January 10, 2011, the Plaintiff filed a lawsuit seeking revocation of a disposition not to grant medical care for official duties (Seoul Administrative Court 201Gudan689) with respect to the part for which the medical care was not approved during the above disposition, and received a partial winning judgment on April 19, 2013, that “the revocation of the disposition not to grant medical care for the reason that the escape certificate No. 5-6 and the reason for the escape certificate No. 4-5 are revoked,” and on March 27, 2014, the Plaintiff’s appeal was dismissed, and the judgment became final and conclusive thereafter.

E. In accordance with the above judgment, the Defendant approved the medical care of the conical signboard escape certificate No. 5-6 and the conical signboard escape certificate No. 4-5, and the conical signboard escape certificate No. 5-6.

arrow