logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2019.09.26 2018고단8312
사기
Text

In the case of the crimes of No. 1 in the judgment of the defendant, a fine of KRW 3 million shall be imposed on the crimes of No. 2 in the judgment of the court.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On August 23, 2018, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment with prison labor for special larceny at the Incheon District Court on August 23, 2018, and the judgment on August 31, 2018 becomes final and conclusive and is still under suspension of execution.

1. Before the judgment becomes final and conclusive, the Defendant is a person engaged in daily work.

On April 17, 2018, the Defendant posted a false statement to the effect that “The Defendant will send two copies of “Berland e.g., transfer money,” to the victim D, who had engaged in telephone calls, posted a statement to the effect that the Defendant sold “Berland e.g.,” online BC e., via a mobile phone at the influorial area of the Gwanak-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City.

However, even if the defendant receives the price for the goods from the victim, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to sell the two diskettess.

The Defendant, as such, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 52,500, under the name of the purchase price of goods from the victim on April 18, 2018, from the post office account (number E) in the name of the Defendant.

In addition, the Defendant, from March 20, 2018 to April 21, 2018, received total of KRW 2,227,500 from 11 victims to 11 times in total as indicated in the first list of crimes as shown in the list of crimes in the attached Table, and acquired the money as the price for goods.

around June 7, 2018, the Defendant drafted a false statement stating that he/she would have access to the Seoul Gwanak-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City website and sell “Berland free right” at a place where the location of Gwanak-gu in Seoul Special Metropolitan City is unknown, and reported it to the victim F, who visited the victim F, “I will send the right to use on face of remittance of money.”

However, the defendant did not have the intent or ability to send the right to freedom, even if he receives money from the victim for the purpose of using the money from the victim as the cost of living.

Around June 7, 2018, the Defendant deceivings the victim as such and belongs to the account of G Bank (H) in the name of the Defendant.

arrow