Plaintiff, Appellant
Plaintiff
Defendant, appellant and appellant
The Seoul Western District Prosecutor
Conclusion of Pleadings
December 3, 2010
The first instance judgment
Seoul Administrative Court Decision 2010Guhap5455 decided June 4, 2010
Text
1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.
Purport of claim and appeal
1. Purport of claim
On January 28, 2010, the Defendant revoked the decision to disclose information to the Plaintiff on January 28, 2010 as to each information listed in the separate sheet Nos. 1 and 2.
2. Purport of appeal
The judgment of the first instance is revoked and the plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
Reasons
1. Quotation of judgment of the first instance;
The court's explanation of this case is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, it is citing this as it is in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
2. Conclusion
Therefore, the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.
Judges Lee Jae-ho (Presiding Judge)