logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2015.12.18 2015나17960
해고무효확인 등
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The reasons for the court's explanation of this case are as follows. Thus, the reasoning for the court's explanation of this case is as stated in the reasoning of the court's decision of the first instance except for the following parts, and it is citing it as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article

[Attachment] The part of the first instance court's decision is "the chief of the defendant's business affairs shall be the chief of the defendant's business affairs around 2010 to 2014 (after that, C shall be the representative of the defendant on May 29, 2015 and the registration thereof was completed on June 23, 2015, and the status of the representative member is maintained up until now)."

In the first instance court's three pages of the first instance court's judgment, "two pages of the first instance court's three

9. “16. 16.” means August 23, 2013 (which appears to be a clerical error, etc., but it appears to be a clerical error). The 3rd and fourth of the first instance judgment “including a number of pages” is deemed to be “including a number of pages if it is not separately indicated.” The 16. 8th of the first instance judgment “the Defendant served on board” is deemed to be “the 10th 15th, 16th 5th 5th 18th 12th 12th 12th 12th 12th 12th 2013th 203th 13th 16th 13th 203th 13th 201th 13th 2013th 13th 16th 2013,” respectively.

The 20 pages 13- 21 of the judgment of the first instance court is as follows.

As seen earlier, the Defendant’s grounds for the dismissal of the instant case include the following: (i) the amount of time for disciplinary reasons, the current status of the grounds for disciplinary action, and the amount of time for causing disciplinary action.

arrow